Exciting enhancements are coming soon to eCode360! Learn more 🡪
City of Bordentown, NJ
Burlington County
By using eCode360 you agree to be legally bound by the Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the Terms of Use, please do not use eCode360.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
A. 
Permits and applications. All permits and development applications involving the development activities that affect an historic landmark or an improvement within an historic district shall be reviewed by the Commission. Such review shall be required for the following actions:
(1) 
Demolition of an historic landmark or an improvement within an historic district.
(2) 
Relocation of any structure within an historic district or of any historic landmark.
(3) 
All changes in any historic features or the exterior architectural appearance of any improvement within an historic district or of any historic landmark by addition, alteration, or replacement.
(4) 
Any new construction of an improvement in an historic district.
(5) 
Site plans or subdivisions affecting an historic landmark or an improvement within an historic district.
(6) 
Zoning variances affecting an historic landmark or an improvement within an historic district.
(7) 
New paint being applied to historically unpainted surfaces.
(8) 
Any work concerning fences, signs, lighting, paving, exterior sheathing, trim, shutters, gutters, or streetscape work.
(9) 
Any request for a field change for a certificate of appropriateness which has already been issued.
A. 
Emergency repairs. A certificate of appropriateness is not required when an historic landmark requires immediate emergency repair due to sudden disaster to preserve the continued habitability of the landmark, the health and safety of its occupants or others, or its historic features from further damage arising from sudden disaster. Nonemergency repairs shall be subject to standard Historic Preservation Commission review procedures and all requirements herein. Only emergency repairs shall be performed following this expedited review procedure:
(1) 
Emergency repairs may be performed in accordance with the applicable construction codes immediately upon approval of the Construction Official in consultation with the Historic Preservation Commission Chair and the Application Review Subcommittee, who shall certify that a bona fide emergency of the type described herein exists, without first obtaining a certificate of appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission. Under such circumstances only, the emergency repairs performed shall be limited to repairs as are necessary to preserve the continued habitability of the building or structure, the health and safety of its occupants or others and/or to protect historic features from further damage. Where feasible, temporary measures to prevent further damage shall be used, provided these measures are reversible without damage to the building or improvements.
(2) 
Simultaneously with the commencement of the emergency work, the property owner shall make a request for a certificate of appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission memorializing the approval of said emergency work. This request shall be made pursuant to the standard procedures set forth in this chapter. A request for certificate of appropriateness for emergency work shall not relieve the requirement to make a request for certificate of appropriateness for all nonemergency work.
(3) 
Emergency review procedures in this section should be strictly limited to those circumstances which, in the opinion of the Construction Official in consultation with the Historic Preservation Commission Chair with the recommendation of the Application Review Subcommittee, rise to the level of a bona fide emergency of the type referenced above. No work in addition to the emergency repairs shall be performed until an appropriate request for certificate of appropriateness has been granted by the Historic Preservation Commission and subsequent appropriate approvals from the Construction Official.
B. 
Interior structures. A certificate of appropriateness is not required when for changes to the interior of structures (not open to public view and not affecting the exterior).
C. 
In-kind maintenance. A certificate of appropriateness is not required for in-kind maintenance or repair of:
(1) 
Existing windows and doors;
(2) 
Existing roof material or shingles;
(3) 
Existing roof structures such as dormers and chimneys;
(4) 
Existing shingles, clapboards, or other siding; or
(5) 
Existing signs, shutters, outdoor displays, fences, hedges, street furniture, awnings, off-street driveway and parking material and sidewalks.
D. 
Painting and cleaning. A certificate of appropriateness is not required when painting or cleaning, except where it is proposed that new paint be applied to historically unpainted surfaces.
Concept plan. At the request of the applicants considering action that may require Commission review, the Commission shall grant an informal review of a concept plan for the proposed undertaking. Neither the applicant not the Commission shall be bound by any informal review.
A. 
General criteria for review. In reviewing an application, or reviewing whether proposed activity or work is affecting a landmark or historic district, the Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning Board, the Zoning Board of Adjustment, the City governing body, and all other officials and agencies of the City responsible for the administration of this chapter shall conduct their review based on the purposes and provisions of this chapter, the Standards and Guidelines of the Secretary of the Interior, and:
(1) 
The impact of the proposed change on the historic, architectural, and/or cultural significance of the landmark or landmark district;
(2) 
The importance of the landmark as a key, contributing or noncontributing building, structure, object, or site to the nation, state, region, or municipality, and the extent to which its historic or architectural interest would be adversely affected to the detriment of public interest;
(3) 
The use of any landmark or landmark district involved in the proposed change;
(4) 
The extent to which the proposed action would adversely affect the public's view from the street of a landmark, building, structure, object, or site located within a landmark district;
(5) 
The impact that the proposed change would have on the architectural or historic significance of the landmark or landmark district and the visual compatibility of the proposed change with adjacent buildings, structures, objects and sites in accordance with the requirements for design compatibility set forth herein.
B. 
Rehabilitation of existing buildings, structures, objects, and sites. In reviewing any application, the Commission shall make its recommendation as to whether any application should be approved, approved with conditions, or denied on the basis of the purposes and the provisions of this chapter and the following standards for review (which are similar to the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings," as hereafter may be amended):
(1) 
Every reasonable effort shall be made by the applicant to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, object, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose.
(2) 
The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible.
(3) 
All buildings, structures, objects and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.
(4) 
Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, object, or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected.
(5) 
Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, object or site shall be treated with sensitivity.
(6) 
Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplication of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures.
(7) 
The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken.
(8) 
Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, or integrity, and such design is compatible with the proportions, size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood or environment.
(9) 
Whenever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired.
C. 
Design criteria for new construction.
(1) 
It is not the intent of this chapter to discourage contemporary architectural expression or to encourage new construction which emulates existing buildings or historical architectural interest or of a certain period of architectural style, but rather to preserve the integrity and authenticity of an historic preservation district and to ensure the compatibility of new structures therein.
(2) 
In assessing the design of any proposed addition or new construction, the Commission shall consider the following design criteria in conjunction with the general review standards, standards of rehabilitation and review criteria set forth above. These design criteria shall be used to analyze the appropriateness of new construction in the form of additions and alterations to the landmarks or new construction, additions, or alterations to buildings, structures, objects, or sites located within landmark districts. The design criteria used are:
(a) 
Height. The height of the proposed structure shall be visually compatible with adjacent buildings.
(b) 
Proportion of facade. The relationship of the width of the building to the height of the front elevation shall be visually compatible with buildings and places to which it is visually related.
(c) 
Proportion of the openings. The relationship of the width of windows to the height of windows in a building shall be visually compatible with buildings and places to which it is visually related.
(d) 
Rhythm of solids. The relationship of solids to voids in the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with buildings and places to which it is visually related.
(e) 
Rhythm of spacing. The relationship of the building to the open space between it and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with buildings and places to which it is visually related.
(f) 
Rhythm of entrances. The relationship of entrances and porches to the street shall be visually compatible to buildings and places to which it is visually related.
(g) 
Relationship of materials. The relationship of materials, texture, and tone to the facade and roof of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in buildings to which it is visually related.
(h) 
Roof. The roof shape of a building shall be visually compatible with buildings to which it is visually related.
(i) 
Continuity of walls. Walls and open fencing shall maintain visual compatibility with buildings and places to which it is visually related.
(j) 
Scale. The size of a building mass in relation to open spaces, window and door openings, porches and balconies shall be visually compatible with buildings and places to which it is visually related.
(k) 
Exterior features. A structure's related exterior features, such as lighting, fences, sidewalks, driveways and parking areas, shall be compatible with the features of those structures to which it is visually related and shall be appropriate for the historic period for which the structure is significant. New signage shall also abide by any supplemental historic design or graphic standards that may be developed by the Commission for the district.
D. 
Review criteria for demolition. With regard to applications to demolish a landmark or any building, structure, object or site located within a landmark district, the Historic Preservation Commission or any other City agency shall consider the following criteria in conjunction with the general review standards (above), and the Secretary of Interior's Standards and guidelines:
(1) 
Its historical, architectural, cultural, and aesthetic significance in relation to the criteria set forth in this chapter.
(2) 
Its use, its intended use, and/or the use for which the buildings, structure, object, or site was originally designed and the feasibility of the continuation of its permitted use.
(3) 
Its importance to the City and the extent to which its historical or architectural value is such that its removal would be detrimental to the landmark district and/or to the public interest.
(4) 
The extent to which it is of such old, unusual, or uncommon design, craftsmanship, texture, or material that it could not be reproduced or could be reproduced only with great difficulty.
(5) 
The extent to which its retention would promote business, create new positions, attract tourists, students, writers, historians, artists, or artisans, encourage study and interest in American history, stimulate interest and study in architecture and design, educate citizens in American culture and heritage or make the City a more attractive and desirable place in which to live.
(6) 
The probable visual impact of its removal upon the ambience of the landmark district.
(7) 
The structural soundness and integrity of the building, structure, object, or site and the economic feasibility for its restoration or rehabilitation so as to allow for its reasonable use.
(8) 
The technological feasibility of structural rehabilitation.
E. 
Criteria regarding the relocation of historic buildings or structures. With regard to applications to move to a new location or site any landmark or any building, structure, object or site located within a landmark district, the Historic Preservation Commission or any other City agency shall consider the following criteria in conjunction with the general review standards (above), and the Secretary of Interior's Standards and guidelines:
(1) 
The impact of the loss of integrity suffered as a result of the removal from the original and/or historic location; and, if located within an historic district, the impact of that loss integrity upon the district as a whole.
(2) 
The reasons for not retaining the landmark or structure at its present site.
(3) 
The compatibility, nature, and character of the areas adjacent to both the present site and the proposed site as they relate to the protection of historic properties and districts as regulated by this chapter.
(4) 
In the event that a proposed new location is in an historic district, the impact on the visual compatibility of adjacent buildings, structures, objects or sites as set forth herein.
(5) 
The likelihood of significant damage to the physical integrity of the building, structure or object itself.
A. 
Referral by City officials to Historic Preservation Commission. Permit applications shall be referred as follows:
(1) 
It shall be the duty of all City officials of the City of Bordentown reviewing all permit applications involving any real property or improvements thereon to determine whether such application involves any activity which should also be the subject of an application for a permit, and if it should be, to inform the Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission, the Administrative Officer, and the applicant of the same.
(2) 
The Administrative Officer shall refer all applications for permits pertaining to regulated activities involving landmarks or any buildings, structures, objects, and sites located within landmark districts to the Historic Preservation Commission, in addition to its referral to any other municipal agencies. A certificate of appropriateness (hereinafter "C/A"), issued by the Historic Preservation Commission in accordance with the procedures of this chapter, is required prior to the commencement of any activities involving landmarks or properties within landmark districts which are governed by the provisions of this chapter.
B. 
Referral by Planning and Zoning Board of Adjustment to Historic Preservation Commission of development applications involving historic landmarks or landmark districts. Compliance is as follows:
(1) 
Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-110, the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Bordentown shall refer to the Historic Preservation Commission every application for development submitted involving historic landmarks or landmark districts. This referral shall be made when the application for development is scheduled for a hearing. The Historic Preservation Commission may provide its advice on said application, which may be conveyed through delegation to one of its members to testify orally at the hearing on the application and to explain any written report(s) that the Historic Preservation Commission may have provided to the Board concerning the application.
(2) 
On all matters referred to the Historic Preservation Commission which require approval by the City Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment, the Historic Preservation Commission may comment on any of the zoning and land use considerations which are relevant to the application. The Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment, as applicable, shall consider testimony and/or written report(s) presented and may disapprove or change any of the recommendations made by the Historic Preservation Commission by a majority of its full authorized membership and shall record the reasons for not following such recommendations.
(3) 
Failure on the part of the Historic Preservation Commission to act within 45 days on an application referred by the Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment shall be deemed an approval in favor of the applicant.
(4) 
An approval of the Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment, as the case may be, does not relieve the applicant of the requirement of obtaining a C/A from the Historic Preservation Commission for those aspects of work not approved by the application for development.
(5) 
Failure by the Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment to refer the application as required shall not invalidate any hearing or proceeding.
C. 
Direct application by property owners to Historic Preservation Commission. It shall be the duty of all property owners contemplating any activity on their property that is within the scope of this chapter to submit an application for a C/A pursuant to the procedures herein.
D. 
Application procedure. The procedure for applications is as follows:
(1) 
Forms. Applications shall be made on forms approved by the City Board of Commissioners and available in the offices of the Administrative Officer and the City Clerk in the Bordentown City Hall. The applicant shall deliver or mail all completed application packages to the offices of the Administrative Officer and the City Clerk at the Bordentown City Hall.
(2) 
Review. Within 10 business days of receipt of a signed C/A application form, the Historic Preservation Commission Chair in consultation with the Administrative Officer shall determine if an application may be reviewed as a minor application or scheduled for a review before the full Historic Preservation Commission. The Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission and the Administrative Officer shall schedule applications for a hearing or administratively approve them as minor applications. The Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission shall determine if the application may be approved as a minor application or if it requires a full hearing by HPC in accordance with the criteria in this chapter. The City Administrative Officer shall provide the applicant with a written notice of the time, date, and place for the required hearing.
(3) 
Vote. The Historic Preservation Commission shall vote to approve the application as complete or deem it incomplete, in accordance with Subsection E, at the scheduled hearing. The Historic Preservation Commission must vote on the completeness of each C/A application before proceeding with the hearing.
E. 
Contents of a complete application. Applications shall include a responsive application form which identifies the applicant, the subject property, and contains a precise written description of the proposed work or activity. The Commission may require the submission of additional information reasonably necessary to reach an informed decision on the application, including but not limited to any of the following:
(1) 
Signed and dated application for C/A form with all applicable information requested completed;
(2) 
Proof of notice to abutting property owners for C/A applications other than minor;
(3) 
Color renderings of any proposed new or replacement sign or awnings;
(4) 
Photographs of the existing structure or lot;
(5) 
Scale drawings showing site plan layout, facade elevations, and specifications for materials;
(6) 
For new construction applications, a streetscape elevation drawn to scale, showing the new structure in the context of neighboring buildings, structures and sites;
(7) 
For large projects, working drawings;
(8) 
For minor applications, photos, measurements, profiles, and drawings of existing historic components in place ("in situ");
(9) 
Information or documentation identified in the sufficiency review report.
A. 
General procedures. The Historic Preservation Commission shall review and have the full authority to grant or deny applications for a certificate of appropriateness, other than for minor applications, at a public hearing.
(1) 
The applicant(s) shall not be required to appear or to be represented at any meeting of the Commission at which the Commission will consider his application for a certificate of appropriateness, regardless of the ultimate findings and a report of the Commission. All applicants are encouraged to participate in presentation of the facts related to their application at the scheduled hearing. All licensed business, commercial, for profit and not-for-profit entities seeking C/A application approval must be represented by legal counsel and appear at the scheduled hearing.
(2) 
Within 45 days of receiving an application for review that requires a hearing, the Commission shall hold such hearing and render a final decision on the application. The Historic Preservation Commission Secretary shall provide to the Administrative Officer, Planning Board and City Commissioners a written decision and report. The report shall include findings and conclusions which are based on evidence in the record.
(3) 
Issuance of an approval of a permit shall be deemed to be final approval pursuant to this chapter. Such approval shall neither cause nor prevent the filing of any collateral application.
(4) 
Failure on the part of the Commission to act on a application within 45 days shall be deemed an approval in favor of the applicant.
(5) 
The denial of a permit shall be deemed to preclude the applicant from undertaking the activity applied for.
B. 
Minor applications. The Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission, in consultation with the Application Review Subcommittee, may review applications determined to be minor applications without holding a public hearing.
(1) 
The Chair, in consultation with the Administrative Officer, may act in place of the full Historic Preservation Commission and directly issue a certificate of appropriateness for such minor work. A report on the approval of each minor application shall be presented to the Historic Preservation Commission by the Chair within 30 days of the date of any approval. The Chair's report on the minor application approval shall become part of the minutes and shall be made available for public review.
(2) 
If the Chair issues a certificate of appropriateness for a minor application, the Chair shall notify City agencies through the Administrative Officer of such issuance of the certificate of appropriateness for minor work; after receipt of such notice of approval, the City agencies may then issue any other applicable permits per their authority and procedures. For the purposes of this Subsection, "City agencies" may include the Administrative Officer, City Board of Commissioners, City Clerk, Planning Board Chair, Code Enforcement Official, Zoning Official, and/or Construction Official.
(3) 
If the Chair does not find the application appropriate, the application shall be scheduled by the Administrative Officer for a public hearing before the full Commission.
(4) 
Final determination of the appropriateness of the minor application shall be made by the Chair, which decision shall be binding on the Administrative Officer.
C. 
Informational copies of applications from Planning Board or Zoning Board of Adjustment. (N.J.S.A. 40:55D-110). The Planning Board and Board of Adjustment shall refer to the Commission every application submitted to either Board for development in historic zoning districts or on historic sites designated on the Zoning or Official Map, historic buffer areas, or identified in any component element of the Master Plan.
A. 
Posting C/A onsite. The owner shall post the certificate of appropriateness on a conspicuous spot on the site visible to the public during the entire process of work.
B. 
Periodic inspection. When a certificate of appropriateness has been issued, the Administrative Officer or his appointee shall, from time to time, inspect the work approved by such certificate and shall regularly report to the Commission the results of such inspections, listing all work inspected and reporting any work not in accordance with such certificate.
C. 
Term of validity. Except as hereafter provided, a certificate of appropriateness shall be valid for a period of two years from date of commission approval unless reasonable extensions are requested by the applicant and approved by the Commission. In cases where demolition is permitted, the C/A shall be valid for one year from the date of the Historic Preservation Commission approval of the application. The one-year period shall not be extended.
D. 
Assignment. No assignment of the rights granted by a certificate of appropriateness shall be permitted.
Appeals from determinations of the Administrative Officer pursuant to referral (C/A) to the Historic Preservation Commission may be made by the applicant to the Zoning Board of Adjustment, according to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70, Subdivision a, and N.J.S.A. 40:55D-72, Subdivision a. Appeals must be filed within 20 days of the date of the notice issued by the Administrative Officer. Nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the right of judicial review of the action after an appeal is concluded by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The appellant shall pay all costs for copies of any transcript(s) required for appeal.