Exciting enhancements are coming soon to eCode360! Learn more 🡪
Township of Springfield, PA
Delaware County
By using eCode360 you agree to be legally bound by the Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the Terms of Use, please do not use eCode360.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
[Adopted 10-9-2012 by Ord. No. 1529]
The Township of Springfield (the "Township"), upon passage of this article, is authorized to enforce Section 3112(a)(3) (relating to traffic-control signals) by recording violations using an automated red-light enforcement system approved by the Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the "Department").
A. 
This article shall only be applicable at intersections in the Township designated by the Township with the approval of the Secretary under the requirements of Subsection B.
B. 
Automated red-light enforcement systems shall be installed when the Township provides notice to the Department of the location of each intersection. After receiving notice and before the system may be installed, the Department shall have 60 days to review each proposed intersection and to issue a recommendation to the Township which shall include all of the following:
(1) 
A statement on whether the proposed intersection is an appropriate location for an automated red-light enforcement system.
(2) 
The data on which the Department based the recommendation.
C. 
No system shall be installed if the Department does not issue a recommendation approving the location to the Township.
D. 
The Department may identify the location of an alternate intersection in the Township that it determines is appropriate for an automated red-light enforcement system.
For each violation under this article, the owner of the vehicle shall be liable for the penalty imposed unless the owner is convicted of the same violation under another section of this title or has a defense under § 138-39.
A certificate, or a facsimile of a certificate, based upon inspection of recorded images produced by an automated red-light enforcement system and sworn to or affirmed by a police officer employed by the Township shall be prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it. The Township must include a written statement that the automated red-light enforcement system was operating correctly at the time of the alleged violation. A recorded image evidencing a violation of Section 3112(a)(3) shall be admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the violation.
A. 
The penalty for a violation under § 138-34 shall be a fine of $100.
B. 
A fine is not authorized for a violation of this article if any of the following apply:
(1) 
The intersection is being manually controlled.
(2) 
The signal is in the mode described in Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3114, relating to flashing signals.
C. 
A fine is not authorized during any of the following:
(1) 
The first 60 days of operation of the automated system at the initial intersection.
(2) 
The first 30 days for each additional intersection selected for the automated system.
D. 
A warning may be sent to the violator under Subsection C.
E. 
A penalty imposed under this article shall not be deemed a criminal conviction and shall not be made part of the operating record under Title 75 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 1535, relating to schedule of convictions and points, of the individual upon whom the penalty is imposed, nor may the imposition of the penalty be subject to merit rating for insurance purposes.
F. 
No surcharge points may be imposed in the provision of motor vehicle insurance coverage. Fines collected under this section shall not be subject to Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3571, relating to commonwealth portion of fines, etc., or Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3573, relating to municipal corporation portion of fines, etc.
A. 
No automated red-light enforcement system shall be utilized in such a manner as to take a frontal view recorded image of the vehicle as evidence of having committed a violation.
B. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, camera equipment deployed as part of an automated red-light enforcement system as provided under this article must be incapable of automated or user-controlled remote intersection surveillance by means of recorded video images. Recorded images collected as part of the automated redlight enforcement system may only record traffic violations and may not be used for any other surveillance purposes. The restrictions set forth under this subsection shall not be deemed to preclude a court of competent jurisdiction from issuing an order directing that the information be provided to law enforcement officials if the information is reasonably described and is requested solely in connection with a criminal law enforcement action.
C. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, information prepared under this article and information relating to violations under this article which is kept by the Township, its authorized agents or employees, including recorded images, written records, reports or facsimiles, names and addresses, shall be for the exclusive use of the Township, its authorized agents, its employees and law enforcement officials for the purpose of discharging their duties under this article and under any ordinances and resolutions of the Township. The information shall not be deemed a public record under the act of February 14, 2008 (P.L.6, No. 3), known as the "Right-to-Know Law."[1] The information shall not be discoverable by court order or otherwise, nor shall it be offered in evidence in any action or proceeding which is not directly related to a violation of this article or any ordinance or resolution of the Township. The restrictions set forth under this subsection shall not be deemed to preclude a court of competent jurisdiction from issuing an order directing that the information be provided to law enforcement officials if the information is reasonably described and is requested solely in connection with a criminal law enforcement action.
[1]
Editor's Note: See 65 P.S. § 67.101 et seq.
D. 
Recorded images obtained through the use of automated red-light enforcement systems deployed as a means of promoting traffic safety in the Township shall be destroyed within 30 days following the final disposition of any recorded event. The Township shall file notice with the Department of State that the records have been destroyed in accordance with this Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3117(f).
E. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, registered vehicle owner information obtained as a result of the operation of an automated red-light enforcement system under this article shall not be the property of the manufacturer or vendor of the automated red-light enforcement system and may not be used for any purpose other than prescribed in this article.
A. 
It shall be a defense to a violation under this article that the person named in the notice of the violation was not operating the vehicle at the time of the violation. The owner may be required to submit evidence that the owner was not the driver at the time of the alleged violation. The Township may not require the owner of the vehicle to disclose the identity of the operator of the vehicle at the time of the violation.
B. 
If an owner receives a notice of violation under this article of a time period during which the vehicle was reported to a police department of any state or municipality as having been stolen, it shall be a defense to a violation under this article that the vehicle had been reported to a police department as stolen prior to the time the violation occurred and had not been recovered prior to that time.
C. 
It shall be a defense to a violation under this article that the person receiving the notice of violation was not the owner or lessor of the vehicle at the time of the offense.
D. 
When a police officer issues a citation for a violation of Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3112(a)(3), at the locations of automated red-light enforcement systems, this article does not apply. In such situations, the recorded images produced by the automated red-light enforcement system may be used as evidence consistent with Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3117(f) and § 138-38B of this article. A motor vehicle citation issued by a police officer at the locations of automated red-light enforcement systems shall be governed by the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code pursuant to Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 101 et seq., and shall not be governed by this article.
No automated red-light enforcement system may be used without the approval of the Department, which shall have the authority to promulgate regulations for the certification and use of such systems.
A. 
The Township may not use an automated red-light enforcement system unless an appropriate sign is posted in a conspicuous place before the area in which the automated red-light enforcement device is to be used notifying the public that an automated red-light enforcement device is in use immediately ahead.
B. 
The Township or its designee shall serve as the system administrator to supervise and coordinate the administration of notices of violations issued under this article.
C. 
The following apply:
(1) 
The system administrator shall prepare a notice of violation to the registered owner of a vehicle identified in a recorded image produced by an automated red-light enforcement system as evidence of a violation of Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3112(a)(3). The issuance of the notice of violation must be done by a police officer employed by the Township. The notice of violation must have attached to it all of the following:
(a) 
A copy of the recorded image showing the vehicle.
(b) 
The registration number and state of issuance of the vehicle registration.
(c) 
The date, time and place of the alleged violation.
(d) 
Notice that the violation charged is under Title 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statute Section 3112(a)(3).
(e) 
Instructions for return of the notice of violation.
(2) 
The text of the notice must be as follows: "This notice shall be returned personally, by mail or by an agent duly authorized in writing, within 30 days of issuance. A hearing may be obtained upon the written request of the registered owner."
A. 
The system administrator may hire and designate personnel as necessary or contract for services to implement this article.
B. 
The system administrator shall process fines issued under this article.
C. 
The system administrator shall submit an annual report to the chairman and minority chairman of the Transportation Committee of the Senate and the chairman and minority chairman of the Transportation Committee of the House of Representatives. The report shall be considered a public record under the Right-to-Know Law and include for the prior year:
(1) 
The number of violations and fines issued.
(2) 
A compilation of fines paid and outstanding.
(3) 
The amount of money paid to a vendor or manufacturer under this article.
In the case of a violation involving a motor vehicle registered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the "commonwealth"), the notice of violation must be mailed within 30 days after the commission of the violation or within 30 days after the discovery of the identity of the registered owner, whichever is later, to the address of the registered owner as listed in the records of the Department. In the case of motor vehicles registered in jurisdictions other than the commonwealth, the notice of violation must be mailed within 30 days after the discovery of the identity of the registered owner to the address of the registered owner as listed in the records of the official in the jurisdiction having charge of the registration of the vehicle. A notice of violation under this article must be provided to an owner within 90 days of the commission of the offense.
Notice of violation must be sent by first class mail. A manual or automatic record of mailing prepared by the system administrator in the ordinary course of business shall be prima facie evidence of mailing and shall be admissible in any judicial or administrative proceeding as to the facts contained in it.
A. 
An owner to whom a notice of violation has been issued may admit responsibility for the violation and pay the fine provided in the notice.
B. 
Payment must be made personally, through an authorized agent, electronically or by mailing both payment and the notice of violation to the system administrator. Payment by mail must be made only by money order, credit card or check made payable to the system administrator. The system administrator shall remit the fine, less the system administrator's operation and maintenance costs necessitated under this article, to the Department for deposit into a restricted receipts account in the Motor License Fund.
C. 
Payment of the established fine and applicable penalties shall operate as a final disposition of the case.
A. 
An owner to whom a notice of violation has been issued may, within 30 days of the mailing of the notice, request a hearing to contest the liability alleged in the notice. A hearing request must be made by appearing before the system administrator during regular office hours either personally or by an authorized agent or by mailing a request in writing.
B. 
Upon receipt of a hearing request, the system administrator shall in a timely manner schedule the matter before a hearing officer. The hearing officer shall be designated by the municipality. Written notice of the date, time and place of hearing must be sent by first class mail to the owner.
C. 
The hearing shall be informal, the rules of evidence shall not apply and the decision of the hearing officer shall be final, subject to the right of the owner to appeal the decision to the Magisterial District Judge.
D. 
If the owner requests in writing that the decision of the hearing officer be appealed to the Magisterial District Judge, the system administrator shall file the notice of violation and supporting documents with the Magisterial District Judge, who shall hear and decide the matter de novo.
The compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the automated red-light enforcement system may not be based upon the number of traffic citations issued or a portion or percentage of the fine generated by the citations. The compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the equipment shall be based upon the value of the equipment and the services provided or rendered in support of the automated red-light enforcement system.
The duration of the yellow light change interval at intersections where automated red-light enforcement systems are in use shall conform to the yellow light change interval duration specified on the traffic signal permit issued by the Department and the Township.
The Township may not collect an amount equal to or greater than 5% of its annual budget from the collection of revenue from the issuance and payment of violations under this article.
This article shall expire July 15, 2017.
As used in this article, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
DESIGNEE
Includes a person, business entity or governmental entity, including the Department.
The costs and additional fees and the informal hearing procedures shall be set forth in Springfield Township Ordinance Number 1530.
The provisions of this article are severable and if any section, sentence, clause, part, or provision hereof shall be held illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision of any court shall not affect or impair the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, parts or provisions of this article. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the Board that this article would have been adopted if such illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional section, sentence, clause, part or provision had not been included herein.
[Added 10-9-2012 by Ord. No. 1530]
The Township of Springfield (the "Township"), upon passage of this article, relating to the Township implementing automated red-light enforcement systems, authorizes the following costs and additional fees and informal hearing procedures.
[Added 10-9-2012 by Ord. No. 1530]
The total sum of costs and additional fees payable by a person who fails to answer a notice of violation issued pursuant to this article shall be:
A. 
Twenty dollars for each notice which remains unappealed or unpaid for more than 30 days from the issuance;
B. 
Twenty-five dollars for each notice which remains unappealed or unpaid for more than 60 days from the issuance; and
C. 
Thirty dollars for each notice which remains unappealed for more than 90 days from issuance.
[Added 10-9-2012 by Ord. No. 1530]
A. 
The system administrator, as defined in this article, shall appoint hearing officers as shall be necessary to carry out the provisions of this article, and the system administrator shall have the power to provide by regulation additional rules for the hearing and determination of cases involving alleged violation of provisions of this article.
B. 
The system administrator shall not be required to submit any evidence other than the following which shall be admissible in such a hearing:
(1) 
The notice of violation, including the recorded image evidencing a violation of Title 75 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 3112(a)(3) and 3117, and of this article.
(2) 
Information from the Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or from another official in the jurisdiction having charge of the registration of the vehicle.
(3) 
A certificate or a facsimile of a certificate, sworn to or affirmed by a Township police officer based upon inspection of recorded images produced by the automated red-light enforcement systems, which shall be prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it; provided, however, that the written documentation provides that the automated red-light enforcement systems were operating correctly at the time of the alleged violation.
(4) 
The Township police officer who signs the notice of violation shall not be required to appear at the hearing unless the respondent has denied liability and the hearing officer determines that the police officer's presence is required. The hearing officer may grant a reasonable continuance if the officer is not available at the time of the hearing.
(5) 
The system administrator shall provide the owner with notice of the decision of the hearing officer, together with any reasons provided by the hearing officer, and advise the owner of his right to appeal the decision of the hearing officer. If the owner does not notify the system administrator of a desire to appeal the decision within 30 days of the mailing of the notice of the decision of the hearing officer, the decision shall be final and liability shall be established pursuant to the decision.
[Added 10-9-2012 by Ord. No. 1530]
The provisions of this article are severable and if any section, sentence, clause, part, or provision hereof shall be held illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision of any court shall not affect or impair the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, parts or provisions of this article. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the board that this article would have been adopted if such illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional section, sentence, clause, part or provision had not been included herein.