A.Â
The Board of Commissioners finds that chronic nuisance properties
have a tremendous negative impact upon the quality of life, safety
and health of the neighborhood where they are located, are a financial
burden to the Township based on the repeated Township services provided
to deal with the nuisance activities that occur at the property, and
pose a threat to the health, safety and welfare of Township residents.
B.Â
These regulations are enacted to remedy nuisance activities that
occur at the properties by providing a process for abatement and accountability.
This remedy is not an exclusive remedy and may be used in conjunction
with any state and/or local laws.
For purposes of Article II, the following words or phrases shall have the meanings prescribed below:
To repair, replace, remove, destroy, or otherwise remedy a condition which constitutes a violation of § 119-11 by such means and in such a manner and to such an extent as the applicable Township department director or designee(s) determines is necessary in the interest of the general health, safety and welfare of the community;
A property which had three or more nuisance activities occur
during any sixty-day period.
The ability to regulate, restrain, dominate, counteract,
mitigate, or govern a property or conduct that occurs on a property.
Means and includes:
Any nuisance as defined by state law or local ordinance occurring
on, around or near a property, including violations of the provisions
of state law and the General Laws of the Township of Haverford.
Any criminal conduct as defined by state law or local ordinance
occurring on, around or near a property, including, but not limited
to, the following activities:
Failure to disperse, as defined in 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5502;
Disorderly conduct, as defined in 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5503;
Prostitution, as defined in 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5902;
Underage drinking, as defined in 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6308;
Any drug-related activity, as defined in 42 Pa.C.S.A. 6801(a)(6);
Noise, as defined in Chapter 117 of the General Laws of the Township of Haverford.
For purposes of this article, nuisance activity shall not include
conduct where the person responsible is the victim of a crime and
had no control over the criminal act.
Natural person, joint venture, partnership, association,
club, company, corporation, business trust, organization, or the manager,
lessee, agent, officer or employee of any of them.
Unless otherwise defined, any person who has titled ownership of the property, an occupant in control of the property, a developer, builder, or business operator or owner who is developing, building or operating a business on the property, and/or any person who has control over the property and allows a violation of § 119-11 to continue.
May be used in Article II interchangeably and means a public or private building, lot, parcel, dwelling, rental unit, structure, real estate or land or portion thereof, including property used as a residential or nonresidential property.
Any structure or that part of a structure, including but
not limited to single-family home, room or apartment, which is rented
to another and used as a home residence, or sleeping place by one
or more persons.
A.Â
When the Chief of Police, or his/her designee(s), receives documentation confirming the occurrence of three or more nuisance activities within a sixty-day period on any property, the Chief of Police, or his/her designee(s), may review such documentation to determine whether it describes the nuisance activities enumerated in the definition of "nuisance activity" in § 119-10. Upon such a finding, the Chief of Police, or his/her designee(s), shall send and/or deliver a written notice to the person responsible for the property, that the property is a chronic nuisance property.
B.Â
The first notice shall contain:
(1)Â
The street address or legal description sufficient for identification
of the property;
(2)Â
A concise description of the nuisance activities that exist or have
occurred;
(3)Â
An instruction that the person responsible for the property shall
respond to the Chief of Police or his/her designee(s) within 10 days
of service of the first notice to discuss the nuisance activities
and create a written and dated agreement to abate the nuisance activity
within an enumerated timeline; and
(4)Â
A statement describing that if the nuisance activity is not abated,
the person responsible for the property may be subject to a criminal
fine of not more than $1,000 per day, and/or civil fines and penalties,
court costs and attorneys' fees.
C.Â
If the person responsible for the property fails to respond to the
first notice within the time prescribed therein, the Chief of Police
or his/her designee(s) shall issue a second notice which declares
the property to be a chronic nuisance property and post the second
notice at the property.
D.Â
The content of the second notice shall contain the same subject matter as enumerated in § 119-12B.
E.Â
If the person responsible for the property fails to respond to the
second notice within the time prescribed therein, the Chief of Police
or his/her designee(s) shall issue to the person responsible for the
property a nontraffic citation for a violation of this article, punishable
by a maximum penalty of $1,000 for each violation date after the failure
to respond to the second notice deadline prescribed therein.
F.Â
If the person responsible for the property fails to respond to three
issued nontraffic citations and the nuisance activity continues, the
matter shall be referred to the Township Solicitor for a civil action
at law and/or equity.
G.Â
If the person responsible for the property responds as required by
the first or second notice and agrees to abate the nuisance activity,
and if the agreed course of action does not result in the abatement
of the nuisance activity within an enumerated timeline of the agreement,
the matter shall be forwarded to the Township Solicitor for a civil
action at law and/or equity.
H.Â
It shall be an affirmative defense to an action for chronic nuisance
property that the person responsible for the property, at all material
times, could not, in the exercise of reasonable care or diligence,
determine that the property had become a chronic nuisance property,
or could not, in spite of the exercise of reasonable care and diligence,
control the property.
A.Â
Once the matter is referred to the Township Solicitor, the Township
Solicitor shall review and make a determination to initiate a civil
action at law and/or equity, or may seek alternative forms of abatement
of the nuisance activity. The Township Solicitor may initiate legal
action on the chronic nuisance property and seek civil penalties,
court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees in Magisterial District
Court and/or the Court of Common Pleas in order to abate the nuisance
activity.
B.Â
If a legal action is commenced in Magisterial District Court, and if the property is found to be a chronic nuisance property under Article II, the Magisterial District Court may impose a civil penalty against any or all of the persons responsible for the property, and may order any other relief the Magisterial District Court deems appropriate. A civil penalty may be assessed in the amount of not more than $1,000 per day for each day the nuisance activity continues to occur following the date of the second notice deadline as defined in § 119-12, and/or following the date of the failure of the agreement to abate, if any was previously agreed to.
C.Â
In assessing the civil penalty, the Magisterial District Court may
consider the following factors:
(1)Â
The actions taken by the person responsible to mitigate or correct
the nuisance activity;
(2)Â
The repeated or continuous nature of the nuisance activity;
(3)Â
The statements of the neighbors or those affected by the nuisance
activity; and
(4)Â
Any other factor deemed relevant by the Magisterial District Court.
D.Â
The Magisterial District Court may assess costs against the person
responsible for the property in the amount of the costs the Township
incurred to abate or attempt to abate the nuisance property, court
costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
E.Â
If the Township Solicitor initiates legal action in Magisterial District
Court, the Magisterial District Court legal action shall not be an
exclusive remedy and may be used in conjunction with any state and/or
local laws. In addition, the initiation of legal action in Magisterial
District Court shall not be the exclusive jurisdiction for the matter
and may be used in conjunction with any legal action at law and/or
in equity in the Court of Common Pleas.
Nothing in this chapter prohibits the Township of Haverford
from taking any emergency action for the summary closure of such property
when it is necessary to avoid an immediate threat to public welfare
and safety. The Township shall provide such notice as is reasonable
under the circumstances.