Exciting enhancements are coming soon to eCode360! Learn more 🡪
Town of Westerly, RI
Washington County
By using eCode360 you agree to be legally bound by the Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the Terms of Use, please do not use eCode360.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
A. 
An appeal from any decision of the Planning Board, or Administrative Officer charged in the regulations with enforcement of any provisions, except as provided herein, may be taken to the Board of Appeal by an aggrieved party. The Board of Appeal shall be the Westerly Zoning Board of Review as provided in RIGL 45-23-57. Appeals from a decision granting or denying approval of a final plan shall be limited to elements of the approval or disapproval not contained in the decision reached by the Planning Board at the preliminary stage, providing that a public hearing has been held on the plan pursuant to RIGL 45-23-42.
B. 
An appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeal may be taken by an aggrieved party to the Washington County Superior Court.
A. 
An appeal to the Board of Appeal from a decision or action of the Planning Board or Administrative Officer may be taken by an aggrieved party to the extent provided in § A261-44. Such appeal must be taken within 20 days after the decision has been recorded in the Town of Westerly's land evidence records and posted in the office of the Town Clerk.
[Amended at time of adoption of Code (see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. I)]
B. 
The appeal shall be in writing and shall state clearly and unambiguously the issue or decision which is being appealed, the reason for the appeal, and the relief sought. The appeal shall either be sent by certified mail, with a return receipt requested, or shall be hand delivered to the Board of Appeal. The Town's Zoning Officer shall accept delivery of an appeal on behalf of the Board of Appeal.
C. 
Upon receipt of an appeal, the Board of Appeal shall require the Planning Board or Administrative Officer to transmit forthwith to the Board of Appeal all papers, documents and plans, or a certified copy thereof, constituting the record of the action which is being appealed.
An appeal shall stay all proceedings in furtherance of the action being appealed.
A. 
The Board of Appeal shall hold a public hearing on the appeal within 45 days of the receipt of the appeal, give public notice thereof, as well as due notice to the parties of interest. At the hearing any party may appear in person, or may be represented by an agent or attorney. The Board shall render a decision within 10 days of the close of the public hearing. The cost of any notice required for the hearing shall be borne by the appellant.
B. 
The Board of Appeal shall only hear appeals of the actions of a Planning Board or Administrative Officer at a meeting called especially for the purpose of hearing such appeals and which has been so advertised.
C. 
The hearing, which may be held on the same date and at the same place as a meeting of the Zoning Board of Review, must be held as a separate meeting from any Zoning Board of Review meeting. Separate minutes and records of votes as required by § A261-48C shall be maintained by the Board of Appeal.
A. 
In instances of a Board of Appeal's review of a Planning Board or Administrative Officer's decision on matters subject to this chapter, the Board of Appeal shall not substitute its own judgment for that of the Planning Board or the Administrative Officer but must consider the issue upon the findings and record of the Planning Board or Administrative Officer. The Board of Appeal shall not reverse a decision of the Planning Board or Administrative Officer except on a finding of prejudicial procedural error, clear error, or lack of support by the weight of the evidence in the record.
B. 
The concurring vote of three of the five members of the Board of Appeal sitting at a hearing shall be necessary to reverse any decision of the Planning Board or Administrative Officer.
C. 
In the instance where the Board of Appeal overturns a decision of the Planning Board or Administrative Officer, the proposed project application shall be remanded to the Planning Board or Administrative Officer, at the stage of processing from which the appeal was taken, for further proceedings before the Planning Board or Administrative Officer and/or for the final disposition, which shall be consistent with the Board of Appeal's decision.
D. 
The Board of Appeal shall keep complete records of all proceedings, including a record of all votes taken, and shall put all decisions on appeals in writing. The Board of Appeal shall include in the written record the reasons for each decision.
A. 
An aggrieved party may appeal a decision of the Board of Appeal to the Washington County Superior Court by filing a complaint setting forth the reasons of appeal within 20 days after the decision has been recorded and posted in the office of the Town Clerk. The Board of Appeal shall file the original documents acted upon by it and constituting the record of the case appealed from, or certified copies thereof, together with such other facts as may be pertinent, with the Clerk of the Court within 30 days after being served with a copy of the complaint. When the complaint is filed by someone other than the original applicant or appellant, the original applicant or appellant and the members of the Planning Board shall be made parties to the proceedings. The appeal shall not stay proceedings upon the decision appealed from, but the Court may, in its discretion, grant a stay on appropriate terms and make such other orders as it deems necessary for an equitable disposition of the appeal.
B. 
The review shall be conducted by the Superior Court without a jury. The Court shall consider the record of the hearing before the Planning Board and, if it shall appear to the Court that additional evidence is necessary for the proper disposition of the matter, it may allow any party to such appeal to present such evidence in open court, which evidence, along with the report, shall constitute the record upon which the determination of the Court shall be made.
C. 
The Court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the Planning Board as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact. The Court may affirm the decision of the Board of Appeal or remand the case for further proceedings, or may reverse or modify the decision if substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because of findings, inferences, conclusions or decisions which are:
(1) 
In violation of constitutional, statutory, ordinance or Planning Board regulations provisions;
(2) 
In excess of the authority granted to the Planning Board by statute or ordinance;
(3) 
Made upon unlawful procedure;
(4) 
Affected by other error of law;
(5) 
Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence of the whole record; or
(6) 
Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.
A. 
An appeal of an enactment of or an amendment of local regulations may be taken to the Washington County Superior Court by filing a complaint, as set forth herein, within 30 days after such enactment or amendment has become effective. The appeal may be taken by any legal resident or landowner of the Town or by any association of residents or landowners of the Town. The appeal shall not stay the enforcement of the local regulations, as enacted or amended, but the Court may, in its discretion, grant a stay on appropriate terms, which may include the filing of a bond, and make such other orders as it deems necessary for an equitable disposition of the appeal.
B. 
The complaint shall set forth with specificity the area or areas in which the enactment or amendment is not consistent with the Comprehensive Planning Act, RIGL 45-22.2-1 et seq.; the Zoning Enabling Act of 1991, RIGL 45-24-27 et seq.; the Town's Comprehensive Plan; or Chapter 260, Zoning.
C. 
The review shall be conducted by the Court without a jury. The Court shall consider whether the enactment or amendment of the local regulations is consistent with the Comprehensive Planning Act, RIGL 45-22.2-1 et seq.; the Zoning Enabling Act of 1991, RIGL 45-24-27 et seq., the Westerly Comprehensive Plan; or Chapter 260, Zoning. If the enactment or amendment is not consistent, then the Court shall invalidate the enactment or the amendment, or those parts of such enactment or amendment which are not consistent. The Court shall not revise the local regulations to be consistent, but may suggest appropriate language as part of the Court decision.
D. 
The Court may, in its discretion, upon motion of the parties or on its own motion, award reasonable attorney's fees to any party to an appeal, as set forth herein, including a municipality.
Upon the entry of any case or proceeding brought under the provisions of this chapter, including pending appeals and appeals hereinafter taken to the Court, the Court shall, at the request of either party, advance the case, so that the matter shall be afforded precedence on the calendar and shall thereupon be heard and determined with as little delay as possible.