[Zoning Order §6.050, 4-2-2008]
A. 
A determination of appropriateness shall be required before the following actions affecting the significance of a landmark may be undertaken:
1. 
Any construction, alteration or removal requiring a building permit from the County;
2. 
Any demolition in whole or part requiring a demolition permit from the County;
3. 
Any construction, alteration, demolition or removal affecting a significant exterior or interior architectural feature or appearance as specified in the ordinance designating the landmark;
4. 
Any construction, alteration or removal involving earth-disturbing activities that would adversely affect archaeological resources.
Applications for a determination of appropriateness shall include accompanying plans and specifications affecting the significance of a designated landmark. Applications for building demolition permits shall be forwarded by the Director to the HPC within seven (7) days following receipt of the application. Any applicant may request a meeting with the HPC before the application is reviewed by the HPC or during the review of the application. Application for review of construction, alteration, demolition or removal not requiring a building permit for which a determination of appropriateness is required shall be made on a form prepared by the HPC and available at the office of the Planning Division. The HPC shall consider the completed application at its next regular meeting.
B. 
Stop Work Order. Whenever the Director or the HPC has reason to believe that an action for which a determination of appropriateness is required has been initiated or is about to be initiated or that a violation of the conditions of a permit has occurred, the Director shall make every reasonable effort to contact the owners, occupants, contractor or subcontractor and inform them of proper procedures. If the HPC determines that a stop work order is necessary to halt an action, it shall request the Director to send a copy of the stop work order by certified mail return receipt requested to the owners, occupants, contractors and subcontractors and notify them of the process of applying for a determination of appropriateness. A copy of the proper application form shall be included in the notice. If necessary, a second (2nd) or subsequent stop work order may be issued for the same project.
C. 
Review And Decision On Issuance Of Determination Of Appropriateness.
1. 
The HPC shall review the application for a Determination of Appropriateness and issue or deny the determination within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the application. Written notice of the approval or denial of the application for a determination of appropriateness shall be provided to the applicant, the Director and the County Council within seven (7) days following the determination and shall be accompanied by a determination of appropriateness in the case of an approval.
2. 
A determination of appropriateness shall become void unless construction is commenced within six (6) months of date of issuance. Determinations of appropriateness shall be issued for a period of eighteen (18) months and are renewable. If the project is not completed according to the guidelines provided in the determination of appropriateness, the Director shall decide if the project is deemed in violation of this Article.
D. 
Denial Of A Determination Of Appropriateness. A denial of a determination of appropriateness shall be accompanied by a findings of fact stating the reasons for the denial. The HPC shall make recommendations to the applicant concerning changes, if any, in the proposed action that would cause the HPC to reconsider its denial and shall confer with the applicant and attempt to resolve as quickly as possible the differences between the applicant and the HPC. The applicant may resubmit an amended application that takes into consideration the recommendation of the HPC.
E. 
Appeal. Any person, official or agency aggrieved by the HPC's denial of appropriateness and who desires to appeal the decision shall file the appeal in the Circuit Court within thirty (30) days after the denial of appropriateness is made.
[Zoning Order §6.060, 4-2-2008]
A. 
Public improvement and land acquisition projects by Jefferson County or any of its departments or agencies shall be reviewed by the HPC in the following manner:
1. 
The Department of Public Works or the Department of Land Use, Development and Code Enforcement (depending on the lead entity) shall notify the HPC regarding any improvement project proposed by Jefferson County or any of its agencies or departments:
a. 
Within, or within two hundred (200) feet of any boundary of, a historic district; or
b. 
On the site of, or within two hundred (200) feet of, any landmarks.
2. 
The HPC shall have at least thirty (30) days to complete its review and report to the Planning Division, except when the Department of Public Works, if necessary to accelerate the design review process, may specify a time less than thirty (30) days within which the HPC shall complete its review and report to the County Council.
3. 
The HPC shall review and comment upon any proposed acquisition of a landmark or of land or buildings within a historic district by Jefferson County or any of its agencies or departments. The Director or the Department of Public Works shall, at the earliest possible date that will not interfere with acquisition negotiations, send the HPC information concerning the location, size, purchase price, current use and proposed use of the land or building to be acquired and specify the date by which the HPC shall comment.
[Zoning Order §6.070, 4-2-2008]
A. 
In considering an application for a determination of appropriateness, the HPC shall be guided in principle by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, as follows, in addition to any design guidelines in the ordinance designating the landmark. Applications, standards for review and design guidelines shall be available at the office of the Planning Division.
1. 
A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.
2. 
The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
3. 
Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken.
4. 
Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right, according to Section 400.1990, shall be retained and preserved.
5. 
Distinctive features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved.
6. 
Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical or pictorial evidence.
7. 
Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
8. 
Significant archaeological resources affected by a project, as determined by a professional archaeologist or the State historic preservation officer, shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
9. 
New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.
[Zoning Order §6.080, 4-2-2008]
A. 
Design guidelines for applying the criteria for review of determinations of appropriateness shall, at a minimum, consider the following architectural criteria:
1. 
Height. The height of any proposed alteration or construction should be compatible with the style and character of the landmark.
2. 
Proportions of windows and doors. The proportions and relationships between doors and windows should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the landmark and with surrounding structures within a historic district.
3. 
Relationship of building masses and spaces. The relationship of a structure to adjoining structures should be compatible.
4. 
Roof shape. The design of the roof should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the landmark and with surrounding structures within a historic district.
5. 
Landscaping. Landscaping should be compatible with the architectural character and appearance of the landmark and landscapes in historic districts.
6. 
Scale. The scale of the structure after alteration, construction or partial demolition should be compatible with its architectural style and character and with surrounding structures within a historic district.
7. 
Directional expression. The directional expression of a landmark after alteration, construction or partial demolition should be compatible with its original architectural style and character. Directional expression is the dominant horizontal or dominant vertical characteristic form and detail of a structure. Facades in historic districts should blend with other structures with regard to directional expression.
8. 
Architectural details. Architectural details including materials, colors and textures should be treated so as to make a landmark compatible with its original architectural style and character and to preserve and enhance the architectural style or character of a landmark or historic district.
9. 
Signage. The character of signs should be in keeping with the historic architectural character of a landmark. Character of a sign includes the number, size, area, scale, location, type, letter size or style and intensity and type of illumination.
10. 
Minimum maintenance. Significant features should be kept in a condition of good repair and maintenance. All structural and mechanical systems should be maintained in a condition and state of repair that will prevent decay, deterioration or damage to significant features or otherwise adversely affect the historic or architectural character of the landmark.
[Zoning Order §6.090, 4-2-2008]
Applications for zoning changes, conditional use permits, site development plans, subdivisions or variances for a landmark or structures within a historic district shall be referred to the HPC by the Planning Division at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the public hearing set by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Zoning Adjustment. The HPC may review these applications using any format which it deems appropriate, provided however, that the applicant shall be notified of the time and place of such review and shall be given the opportunity to appear and be heard. Within fifteen (15) days after receipt of said application, the HPC shall forward its comments to the Planning Division.
[Zoning Order §6.100, 4-2-2008]
None of the provisions of this Chapter shall be construed to prevent any measures of construction, alteration or demolition necessary to correct or abate the unsafe or dangerous condition of any structure, other feature or part thereof, where such condition has been declared unsafe or dangerous by the Director and where the proposed measures have been declared necessary, by such department or departments, to correct the said condition; provided however, that only such work as is reasonably necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous condition may be performed pursuant to this Section. In the event any structure or other feature shall be damaged by fire or other calamity or by act of God or by the public enemy to such an extent that in the opinion of the aforesaid department or departments it cannot reasonably be repaired and restored, it may be removed in conformity with normal procedures and applicable laws.