Conditions specified in § 176-6.02K shall apply to any compliance schedule required by the City.
A. 
Except as specified in a WDP, all permitted dischargers must, at a frequency determined by the Director, submit no less than twice per year (June and December [or on dates specified]) reports indicating the nature, concentration of pollutants in the discharge which are limited in the WDP, and the measured or estimated average and maximum daily flows for the reporting period. In cases where compliance with a best management practice is required, the discharger must submit documentation required by permit necessary to determine compliance status.
B. 
The Director may authorize a discharger to forego sampling of a pollutant if it can be demonstrated through sampling and other technical factors that the pollutant is neither present nor expected to be present in the discharge or is present only at background levels from intake water and without any increase in the pollutant due to activities of the discharger. This authorization is subject to the following conditions:
(1) 
The waiver may be authorized where a pollutant is determined to be present solely due to sanitary wastewater discharged from the facility provided that the sanitary wastewater includes no process wastewater.
(2) 
The monitoring waiver is valid only for the duration of the effective period of the WDP, but in no case longer than five years. The discharger must submit a new request for the waiver before the waiver can be granted for each subsequent WDP.
(3) 
In demonstrating that a pollutant is not present, the discharger must provide data from at least one sampling of the facility's process wastewater prior to any treatment present at the facility that is representative of all wastewater from all processes.
(4) 
The request for a monitoring waiver must be signed in accordance with and include the certification statement in § 176-9.13 and 40 CFR 403.6(a)(2)(ii).
(5) 
Nondetectable sample results may be used only to demonstrate that a pollutant is not present if the EPA-approved method from 40 CFR Part 136 with the lowest minimum detection level for that pollutant was used in the analysis.
(6) 
Any grant of the monitoring waiver by the Director must be included as a condition in the discharger's permit. The reasons supporting the waiver and any information submitted by the discharger in its request for the waiver must be maintained by the Director for three years after waiver expiration.
(7) 
Upon approval of the monitoring waiver and revision of the discharger's permit by the Director, the discharger must certify on each report with a statement that there has been no increase in the pollutant in its waste stream due to the discharger's activities.
(8) 
In the event that a waived pollutant is found to be present or is expected to be present because of changes that occur in the discharger's operations, the discharger must immediately notify the Director and comply with monitoring requirements imposed by the Director.
C. 
Reduced reporting is not available to dischargers that have, in the last two years, been in noncompliance with any terms or conditions of a WDP. In addition, reduced reporting is not available to dischargers with daily flow rates, production levels, or pollutant levels that vary so significantly that, in the Director's opinion, decreasing the reporting requirement for the discharger would result in data that is not representative of conditions occurring during the reporting period.
D. 
All periodic compliance reports must be signed and certified in accordance with § 176-9.13 of this chapter.
Any discharger who experiences an upset in operations which places the discharger in a temporary state of noncompliance with this chapter shall inform the City thereof immediately upon first awareness of the commencement of the upset. Where such information is given orally, the City employee shall produce a written follow-up report within five days. The report shall specify:
A. 
The description of the upset, the cause thereof and the upset's impact on a discharger's compliance status;
B. 
The duration of noncompliance, including exact dates and times of noncompliance and, if the noncompliance continues, the time by which compliance is reasonably expected to occur;
C. 
All steps taken or to be taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of such an upset or other condition of noncompliance. A documented and verified bona fide operating upset shall be an affirmative defense to any enforcement action brought by the City against a discharger for any noncompliance with this chapter, which arises out of violations alleged to have occurred during the period of the upset.
Each discharger must notify the Director of any significant changes to the discharger's operations or system which may alter the nature, quality, or volume of its wastewater at least 14 days before the change.
A. 
The Director may require the discharger to submit such information deemed necessary to evaluate the changed condition, including submission of a WDP application.
B. 
The Director may issue a WDP or modify an existing WDP in response to changed conditions or anticipated changed conditions.
In the case of any discharge, including, but not limited to, accidental discharges, discharges of a nonroutine, episodic nature, a noncustomary batch discharge, a slug discharge or slug load, that might cause potential problems for the WRRF, the discharger shall immediately notify the Director of the incident. This notification shall include date and time, location of discharge, type of waste, concentration and volume, if known, and corrective actions taken by the discharger.
A. 
Within five days following such discharge, the discharger shall, unless waived by the Director, submit a detailed written report describing the cause(s) of the discharge and the measures to be taken by the discharger to prevent similar future occurrences. Such notification shall not relieve the discharger of any expense, loss, damage, or other liability which might be incurred because of damage to the WRRF, natural resources, or any other damage to person or property; nor shall such notification relieve the discharger of any fines, penalties, or other liability which may be imposed pursuant to this chapter.
B. 
A notice shall be permanently posted on the discharger's bulletin board or other prominent place advising employees who to call in the event of a discharge described in this section. Employers shall ensure that all employees who could cause such a discharge to occur are advised of the emergency notification procedure.
All dischargers not required to obtain a WDP shall provide appropriate reports to the Director as the Director may require.
If sampling performed by a discharger indicates a violation, the Director must be notified within 24 hours of the discharger's becoming aware of the violation. The discharger shall be required to repeat sampling in conformance with WDP requirements and conditions.
Unless authorized by Maine Hazardous Waste Management Rules and thereafter approved by the Director, there shall be no discharge of hazardous waste to the City's sewers or WRRF.
All pollutant analyses, including sampling techniques, to be submitted as part of a WDP application or report, shall be performed in accordance with the techniques prescribed in 40 CFR Part 136 and amendments thereto. If 40 CFR Part 136 does not contain sampling or analytical techniques for the pollutant in question, or where the EPA determines that Part 136 sampling and analytical techniques are inappropriate for the pollutant in question, sampling and analyses shall be performed by using validated analytical methods or any other applicable sampling and analytical procedures, including procedures suggested by the Director or other parties approved by EPA.
The types of samples collected to satisfy reporting requirements must be based on data obtained through appropriate sampling and analysis performed during the period covered by the report, and based on data that is representative of conditions occurring during the reporting period.
A. 
Except as indicated in Subsections B and C below, the discharger must collect wastewater samples using twenty-four-hour, flow proportional composite sampling techniques, unless the Director authorizes time proportional composite sampling or grab sampling. Where time proportional composite sampling or grab sampling is authorized, the samples must be representative of the discharge. Using protocols (including appropriate preservation) specified in 40 CFR Part 136 and appropriate EPA guidance, multiple grab samples collected during a twenty-four-hour period may be composited prior to the analysis as follows: for cyanide, total phenols, and sulfides the samples may be composited in the laboratory or in the field; for volatile organics and oil and grease, the samples may be composited in the laboratory. Composite samples for other parameters unaffected by the compositing procedures as documented in approved EPA methodologies may be authorized by the Director, as appropriate. In addition, grab samples may be required to show compliance with instantaneous limits.
B. 
Samples for oil and grease, temperature, pH, cyanide, total phenols, sulfides, and volatile organic compounds, if required, must be obtained using grab collection techniques.
C. 
A minimum of four grab samples must be used for pH, cyanide, total phenols, oil and grease, sulfide and volatile organic compounds for facilities for which historical sampling data do not exist; for facilities for which historical sampling data are available, the Director may authorize a lower minimum. For the reports required in a discharger's WDP or this chapter, the discharger is required to collect the number of grab samples necessary to assess and assure compliance with applicable WDP requirements.
Written reports will be deemed to have been submitted on the date postmarked. For reports which are not mailed the date of receipt of the report shall govern.
A. 
All dischargers subject to this chapter shall retain and preserve, for no less than three years, any records, books, documents, memoranda, reports, correspondence and any and all summaries thereof relating to monitoring, sampling and chemical analyses made by or on behalf of a discharger in connection with its discharge. All records which pertain to matters which are the subject of enforcement or litigation activities brought by the City pursuant hereto shall be retained and preserved by the discharger until all enforcement activities have concluded and all periods of limitation with respect to any and all appeals have expired.
B. 
Records shall include the date, location, method, and time of sampling, and the name of the person(s) taking the samples; the dates analyses were performed; who performed the analyses; the analytical techniques or methods used; and results of such analyses. These records shall remain available for a period of at least three years. (Reference: ME DEP Rules, Chapter 528)
A. 
Certification of Permit Applications, Discharger Reports, and Initial Monitoring Waiver.
(1) 
The following certification statement is required to be signed and submitted by dischargers submitting permit applications, dischargers submitting periodic compliance reports, and dischargers submitting an initial request to forego sampling of a pollutant. The following certification statement must be signed by an authorized representative:
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
B. 
Certification of pollutants not present.
(1) 
Dischargers that have an approved monitoring waiver must certify on each report with the following statement that there has been no increase in the pollutant, in its waste stream, due to activities of the discharger.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with Wastewater Discharge Permit issued by the Saco Water Resource Recovery Department, I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there has been no increase in the level of _____ [list pollutant(s)] in the wastewaters due to the activities at the facility since filing of the last periodic report on __________.
C. 
(Reference: ME DEP Rules, Chapter 528)