[HISTORY: Adopted by the City of Isanti 7-20-2021 by Ord. No. 759. Amendments noted where applicable.]
A. 
To provide for the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens, and to ensure the integrity of its streets and the appropriate use of the rights-of-way, the City of Isanti strives to keep its rights-of-way in a state of good repair and free from unnecessary encumbrances.
B. 
The City of Isanti hereby enacts this chapter relating to right-of-way and small cell wireless permits and administration. This chapter imposes reasonable regulation on the placement and maintenance of facilities and equipment currently within its rights-of-way or to be placed therein at some future time. It is intended to complement the regulatory roles of state and federal agencies. Under this chapter, persons constructing within, excavating and obstructing the rights-of-way will bear financial responsibility for their work. Finally, this chapter provides for recovery of out-of-pocket and projected costs from persons using the public rights-of-way.
C. 
This chapter shall be interpreted consistently with Minn. Stat. §§ 237.16, 237.162, 237.163, 237.79, 237.81, and 238.086 (the "Act"), and the other laws governing applicable rights of the City and users of the right-of-way. This chapter shall also be interpreted consistent with Minnesota Rules 7819.0050 - 7819.9950 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560 where possible. To the extent any provision of this chapter cannot be interpreted consistently with the Minnesota Rules, that interpretation most consistent with the Act and other applicable statutory and case law is intended. This chapter shall not be interpreted to limit the regulatory and police powers of the City to adopt and enforce general ordinances necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
Pursuant to the authority granted to the City under state and federal statutory, administrative and common law, the City hereby elects, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 237.163 Subd. 2(b), to manage rights-of-way within its jurisdiction.
The following definitions apply in this chapter. References hereafter to "sections" are, unless otherwise specified, references to sections in this chapter. Defined terms remain defined terms, whether or not capitalized.
ABANDONED FACILITY
A facility no longer in service or physically disconnected from a portion of the operating facility, or from any other facility, that is in use or still carries service. A facility is not abandoned unless declared so by the right-of-way user.
APPLICANT
Any person requesting permission to excavate or obstruct a right-of-way or requesting permission to co-locate a small cell wireless facility.
CITY
The City of Isanti, Minnesota. For purposes of § 257-29, "City" also means the City's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents.
CO-LOCATE or CO-LOCATION
To install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure or utility pole that is owned privately, or by the City or other governmental unit.
COMMISSION
The State of Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
CONGESTED RIGHT-OF-WAY
A crowded condition in the subsurface of the public right-of-way that occurs when the maximum lateral spacing between existing underground facilities does not allow for construction of new underground facilities without using hand digging to expose the existing lateral facilities in conformance with Minn. Stat. § 216D.04, Subd. 3, over a continuous length in excess of 500 feet.
CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND
Any of the following forms of security provided at permittee's option and approved by the City:
A. 
Individual project bond;
B. 
Cash deposit;
C. 
Security of a form listed or approved under Minn. Stat. § 15.73, Subd. 3;
D. 
Letter of credit, in a form acceptable to the City;
E. 
Self-insurance, in a form acceptable to the City;
F. 
A blanket bond for projects within the City, or other form of construction bond, for a time specified and, in a form, acceptable to the City.
DELAY PENALTY
The penalty imposed as a result of unreasonable delays in right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration as established by permit.
DEPARTMENT
The Public Works or Engineering Department of the City of Isanti.
EMERGENCY
A condition that:
A. 
Poses a danger to life or health, or of a significant loss of property; or
B. 
Requires immediate repair or replacement of facilities in order to restore service to a customer.
EQUIPMENT
Any tangible asset used to install, repair, or maintain facilities in any right-of-way.
EXCAVATE
To dig into or in any way remove or physically disturb or penetrate any part of a right-of-way.
FACILITY or FACILITIES
Any tangible asset in the right-of-way required to provide utility service.
FIVE-YEAR PROJECT PLAN
A document listing projects adopted by the City for construction within the next five years.
HIGH DENSITY CORRIDOR
A designated portion of the public right-of-way within which telecommunications right-of-way users having multiple and competing facilities may be required to build and install facilities in a common conduit system or other common structure.
HOLE
An excavation in the pavement, with the excavation having a length less than the width of the pavement.
LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE
A local person or persons, or designee of such person or persons, authorized by an applicant or permittee to accept service and to make decisions for that applicant or permittee regarding all matters within the scope of this chapter.
MANAGEMENT COSTS
The actual costs the City incurs in managing its rights-of-way, including such costs, if incurred, as those associated with registering applicants; issuing, processing, and verifying right-of-way or small wireless facility permit applications; inspecting job sites and restoration projects; maintaining, supporting, protecting, or moving user facilities during right-of-way work; determining the adequacy of right-of-way restoration; restoring work inadequately performed after providing notice and the opportunity to correct the work; and revoking right-of-way or small wireless facility permits. Management costs do not include payment by a telecommunications right-of-way user for the use of the right-of-way, unreasonable fees of a third-party contractor used by the City including fees tied to or based on customer counts, access lines, or revenues generated by the right-of-way or for the City, the fees and cost of litigation relating to the interpretation of Minnesota Session Laws 1997, Chapter 123; Minn. Stat. § 237.162 or 237.163; or any ordinance enacted under those sections, or the City fees and costs related to appeals taken pursuant to § 257-31 of this chapter.
OBSTRUCT
To place any tangible object in a right-of-way so as to hinder free and open passage over that or any part of the right-of-way.
PATCH or PATCHING
A method of pavement replacement that is temporary in nature. A patch consists of the compaction of the subbase and aggregate base, and the replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement for a minimum of two feet beyond the edges of the excavation in all directions. A patch is considered full restoration only when the pavement is included in the City's five-year project plan.
PAVEMENT
Any type of improved surface that is within the public right-of-way and that is paved or otherwise constructed with bituminous, concrete, aggregate, or gravel.
PERMIT
The permit which, pursuant to this chapter, must be obtained before a person may excavate or obstruct in a right-of-way or co-locate a small cell wireless facility. A permit allows the permittee to work in that part of the right-of-way and do such work described and approved in such permit.
PERMIT FEE
Money paid to the City by an applicant to cover the costs as provided in § 257-11.
PERMITTEE
Any person to whom a permit to excavate, obstruct or co-locate in the right-of-way has been granted by the City under this chapter.
PERSON
An individual or entity subject to the laws and rules of this state, however organized, whether public or private, whether domestic or foreign, whether for profit or nonprofit, and whether natural, corporate, or political.
PROBATION
The status of a person that has not complied with the conditions of this chapter.
PROBATIONARY PERIOD
One year from the date that a person has been notified, in writing, that they have been put on probation.
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY or RIGHT-OF-WAY
The area on, below, or above a public roadway, highway, street, alley, bicycle path, or public sidewalk in which the City has an interest, including other dedicated rights-of-way for travel purposes and utility easements of the City. This includes all public grounds. A right-of-way does not include the airwaves above a right-of-way or public grounds with regard to cellular or other non-wire-telecommunications or broadcast service.
RESTORATION COST
The amount of money paid to the City by a permittee to achieve the level of restoration according to Plates 1 to 13 of Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Rules.
RESTORE or RESTORATION
The process by which an excavated right-of-way and surrounding area, including pavement and foundation, is returned to the same condition and life expectancy that existed before excavation.
RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT
Either the excavation permit or the obstruction permit, or small wireless facility, depending on the context, required by this chapter.
RIGHT-OF-WAY USER
A. 
A telecommunications right-of-way user as defined by Minn. Stat. § 237.162, Subd. 4; or
B. 
A person owning or controlling a facility in the right-of-way that is used or intended to be used for providing utility service, and who has a right under law, franchise, or ordinance to use the public right-of-way.
SERVICE LATERAL
An underground facility that is used to transmit, distribute or furnish natural gas, electricity, communications, and water from a common source to an end-use customer. A service lateral is also an underground facility that is used in the removal of wastewater from a customer's premises.
SERVICE or UTILITY SERVICE
Includes:
A. 
Those services provided by a public utility as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216B.02, Subd. 4 and 6;
B. 
Services of a telecommunications right-of-way user, including transporting of voice or data information;
C. 
Services of a cable communications systems as defined in Minn. Stat. Chapter 238;
D. 
Natural gas or electric energy or telecommunications services provided by the City;
E. 
Services provided by a cooperative electric association organized under Minn. Stat. Chapter 308A; and
F. 
Water and sewer, including service laterals, steam, cooling, or heating services.
SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY
A wireless facility that meets both of the following qualifications:
A. 
Each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or could fit within such an enclosure; and
B. 
All other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility is, in aggregate, no more than 28 cubic feet in volume, not including electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment.
[Amended at time of adoption of Code (see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. II)]
SUPPLEMENTARY APPLICATION
An application made to excavate or obstruct more of the right-of-way than allowed in, or to extend, a permit that had already been issued.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS RIGHT-OF-WAY USER
A person owning or controlling a facility in the right-of-way, or seeking to own or control a facility in the right-of-way that is used or is intended to be used for providing wireless service, or transporting telecommunication or other voice or data information. For purposes of this chapter, a cable communication system defined and regulated under Minn. Stat. Chapter 238 and telecommunication activities related to providing natural gas or electric energy services, a public utility as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216B.02, a municipality, a municipal gas or power agency organized under Minn. Stat. Chapter 453 and 453A, or a cooperative electric association organized under Minn. Stat. Chapter 308A are not telecommunications right-of-way users for purposes of this chapter except to the extent such entity is offering wireless service.
TEMPORARY SURFACE
The compaction of subbase and aggregate base and replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement only to the edges of the excavation. It is temporary in nature except when the replacement is of pavement included in the City's two-year plan, in which case it is considered full restoration.
TRENCH
An excavation in the pavement, with the excavation having a length equal to or greater than the width of the pavement.
TWO-YEAR PROJECT PLAN
Shows projects adopted by the City for construction within the next two years.
UTILITY POLE
A pole that is used in whole or in part to facilitate telecommunications or electric service.
WIRELESS FACILITY
Equipment at a fixed location that enables the provision of wireless services between user equipment and a wireless service network, including equipment associated with wireless service, a radio transceiver, antenna, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and a small wireless facility, but not including wireless support structures, wireline backhaul facilities, or cables between utility poles or wireless support structures, or not otherwise immediately adjacent to and directly associated with a specific antenna.
WIRELESS SERVICE
Any service using licensed or unlicensed wireless spectrum, including the use of Wi-Fi, whether at a fixed location or by means of a mobile device, that is provided using wireless facilities. Wireless service does not include services regulated under Title VI of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, including cable service.
WIRELESS SUPPORT STRUCTURE
A new or existing structure in a right-of-way designed to support or capable of supporting small wireless facilities, as reasonably determined by the City. Also referred to as a "pole."
The City Administrator or her/his designee is the principal City official responsible for the administration of the rights-of-way, right-of-way permits, small cell wireless permits and the ordinances related thereto. The City Administrator or her/his designee may delegate any or all of the duties hereunder.
A. 
Permit required. Except as otherwise provided in this code, no person may obstruct or excavate any right-of-way, or install or place facilities in the right-of-way, without first having obtained the appropriate right-of-way work or small cell wireless permit from the City to do so.
B. 
Right-of-way work permits cover the following activities:
(1) 
Excavation. A right-of-way permit is required by a registrant to excavate that part of the right-of-way described in such permit and to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of the right-of-way by placing facilities described therein, to the extent and for the duration specified therein.
(2) 
Obstruction. A right-of-way permit is required by a registrant to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of right-of-way by placing equipment described therein on the right-of-way, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. An additional permit for obstruction is not required if a person already possesses a valid right-of-way permit for excavation with the same project.
C. 
Small cell wireless/pole attachment permits cover the following activity:
(1) 
A small cell wireless/pole attachment permit is required to erect or install a wireless support structure, to co-locate a small wireless facility, or to otherwise install a small wireless facility in the specified portion of the right-of-way, to the extent specified therein, provided that such permit shall remain in effect for the length of time the facility is in use, unless lawfully revoked.
D. 
Permit extensions. No person may excavate or obstruct the right-of-way beyond the date or dates specified in the permit unless such person makes a supplementary application for another right-of-way permit before the expiration of the initial permit, and a new permit or permit extension is granted.
E. 
Delay penalty. In accordance with Minnesota Rules 7819.1000, Subp. 3, and notwithstanding Subsection B of this section, the City shall establish and impose a delay penalty for unreasonable delays in right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration.
[Amended at time of adoption of Code (see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. II)]
F. 
Permit display. Permits issued under this chapter shall be conspicuously displayed or otherwise available at all times at the indicated work site and shall be available for inspection by the City.
Application for a permit is made to the City. Right-of-way permit applications shall contain, and will be considered complete only upon compliance with, the requirements of the following provisions:
A. 
Submission of a completed permit application form, including all required attachments, and scaled drawings showing the location and area of the proposed project and the location of all known existing and proposed facilities.
B. 
Payment of money due the City for:
(1) 
Permit fees, estimated restoration costs, and other management costs;
(2) 
Prior obstructions or excavations;
(3) 
Any undisputed loss, damage, or expense suffered by the City because of applicant's prior excavations or obstructions of the rights-of-way or any emergency actions taken by the City;
(4) 
Franchise fees or other charges, if applicable.
C. 
Payment of disputed amounts due the City by posting security in an amount equal to the disputed amount, in a form approved by the City, or by depositing the disputed amount in an escrow account.
D. 
Posting an additional or larger construction performance bond for additional facilities when an applicant requests an excavation permit to install additional facilities and the City deems the existing construction performance bond inadequate under applicable standards.
Prior to placing, installing, modifying, relocating or removing a small wireless facility or wireless support structure in the ROW, or to co-locating a wireless facility on an existing wireless support structure in the ROW, the operator shall obtain a permit from the City. The City may require additional information as reasonably necessary to evaluate the application and the impact of the proposed installation(s) on the public health, safety and welfare or on use or management of the ROW.
A. 
Proof of agent designation (if applicable). If the applicant is serving as an agent of a small wireless operator, the applicant must provide written documentation of the agent designation signed by the operator.
B. 
Map. The applicant must include an aerial map showing the location of the proposed or existing support structure to which the small wireless facility is proposed to be attached, or from which a small wireless facility is proposed to be removed.
C. 
Photo simulations. For all applications to locate small wireless facilities in the ROW, the applicant shall provide photo simulations from at least two reasonable line-of-site locations near the proposed project site. The photo simulations must be taken from the viewpoints of the greatest pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
D. 
Consolidated applications. An applicant seeking to construct, modify, co-locate or replace more than one small wireless facility or more than one wireless support structure within the City may file a consolidated application for up to 15 small wireless facility requests or wireless support structure requests, provided the requests grouped on a consolidated application only address substantially the same type of small wireless facilities or substantially the same type of wireless support structures, and provided that all small wireless facilities in the application are located within a two-mile radius. (NOTE: The City may treat each request individually during application review and processing and when issuing a determination or applying these guidelines.)
E. 
Site and other plans and structural calculations. The applicant must include fully dimensioned site plans, elevation drawings and structural calculations that depict any known existing wireless facilities with all existing transmission equipment and other improvements, the proposed facility with all proposed transmission equipment and other improvements, and the legal boundaries of the existing right-of-way and any associated access and utility easements. Fully dimensioned site plans shall indicate the spacing from existing curb, driveways, sidewalks, light poles and any other poles or appurtenances.
F. 
Full description of number and dimensions of facilities and/or structures to be installed. The applicant must include a full description of the number and dimensions of all small wireless facilities proposed to be installed and the wireless support structure, either new or existing, to be utilized for each small wireless facility. For all equipment proposed to be installed, the applicant must include: 1) the manufacturer's name and model number; 2) physical dimensions, including without limitation, height, width, depth and weight with mounts and other necessary hardware; and (3) the ambient noise level generated from the equipment, if any.
G. 
Owner's authorization. For any application to attach a small wireless facility to a wireless support structure that is not owned by the City, the applicant must submit evidence sufficient to show that either: 1) the applicant owns the proposed support structure; or 2) the applicant has obtained the owner's written authorization to file the application.
A. 
Deadline for action. The City shall approve or deny a small wireless facility permit application within 90 days after filing of such application. The small wireless facility permit, and any associated building permit application, shall be deemed approved if the City fails to approve or deny the application within the review periods established in this section.
B. 
Consolidated applications.
(1) 
In rendering a decision on a consolidated permit application, the City may approve some small wireless facilities and deny others, but may not use denial of one or more permits as a basis to deny all small wireless facilities in the application.
C. 
Tolling of deadline. The ninety-day deadline for action on a small wireless facility permit application may be tolled if:
(1) 
The City receives applications from one or more applicants seeking approval of permits for more than 30 small wireless facilities within a seven-day period. In such case, the City may extend the deadline for all such applications by 30 days by informing the affected applicants, in writing, of such extension.
(2) 
The applicant fails to submit all required documents or information and the City provides written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application. Upon submission of additional documents or information, the City shall have 10 days to notify the applicant, in writing, of any still-missing information.
(3) 
The City and a small wireless facility applicant agree, in writing, to toll the review period.
A. 
Permit issuance. If the applicant has satisfied the requirements of this chapter, the City shall issue a permit.
B. 
Conditions. The City may impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of the permit and the performance of the applicant thereunder to protect the health, safety, and welfare or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use. In addition, a permittee shall comply with all requirements of local, state, and federal laws, including but not limited to Minn. Stat. §§ 216D.01 to 216D.09 (Gopher One Call Excavation Notice System) and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560.
C. 
Small wireless facility conditions. In addition to Subsection B, the erection or installation of a wireless support structure, the co-location of a small wireless facility, or other installation of a small wireless facility in the right-of-way, shall be subject to the following conditions:
(1) 
A small wireless facility shall only be co-located on the particular wireless support structure, under those attachment specifications, and at the height indicated in the applicable permit application.
(2) 
No new wireless support structure installed within the right-of-way shall exceed 50 feet in height without the City's written authorization, provided that the City may impose a lower height limit in the applicable permit to protect the public health, safety and welfare or to protect the right-of-way and its current use, and further provided that a registrant may replace an existing wireless support structure exceeding 50 feet in height with a structure of the same height subject to such conditions or requirements as may be imposed in the applicable permit.
(3) 
No wireless facility may extend more than 10 feet above its wireless support structure.
(4) 
Where an applicant proposes to install a new wireless support structure in the right-of-way, the City may impose separation requirements between such structure and any existing wireless support structure or other facilities in and around the right-of-way.
(5) 
Where an applicant proposes co-location on a decorative wireless support structure, sign or other structure not intended to support small wireless facilities, the City may impose reasonable requirements to accommodate the particular design, appearance or intended purpose of such structure.
(6) 
Where an applicant proposes to replace a wireless support structure, the City may impose reasonable restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements on the replacement of such structure.
D. 
Limitations. While the City fully intends to apply the guidelines established in Chapter 257 uniformly to all small wireless facility applications, there may be circumstances where not every specific guideline may be met. In this case, City staff will use its reasonable discretion in approving small wireless facilities permit applications that deviate from the strict application of this chapter.
A. 
A small cell wireless facility shall only be co-located on a small wireless support structure owned or controlled by the City, or any other City asset in the right-of-way, after the applicant has executed a standard small wireless facility co-location agreement with the City.
B. 
The standard co-location agreement shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the required small cell wireless permit; provided, however, that the applicant shall not be additionally required to obtain a license or franchise in order to co-locate. Issuance of a small cell wireless permit does not supersede, alter or affect any then-existing agreement between the City and applicant.
A. 
Excavation. The City shall impose a right-of-way work permit fee in an amount sufficient to recover City management costs for excavations. The fee shall be per the City Fee Schedule.
B. 
Obstruction. The City shall impose a right-of-way work permit fee in an amount sufficient to recover City management costs for obstructions (unless combined with a permit for excavations).
C. 
Street cutting. The City shall impose fees for street cutting and require an escrow in addition to the right-of-way work permit per the City Fee Schedule.
D. 
Small wireless facility. The City shall impose a small cell wireless permit fee for a small wireless facility in an amount sufficient to recover:
(1) 
Management costs; and
(2) 
City engineering, make-ready, and construction costs associated with co-location of small wireless facilities.
(a) 
Engineering fees are based on actual engineering staff time. Additional time necessary to review based upon complexity of application may be billed to the applicant.
E. 
Payment of permit fees. No excavation permit or obstruction permit shall be issued without payment of excavation or obstruction permit fees. The City may allow applicant to pay such fees within 30 days of billing.
F. 
Nonrefundable. Permit fees that were paid for a permit that the City has revoked for a breach as stated in § 257-21 are not refundable.
G. 
Application to franchises. Unless otherwise agreed to in a franchise, management costs may be charged separately from and in addition to the franchise fees imposed on a right-of-way user in the franchise.
A. 
Timing. The work to be done under the excavation permit, and the patching and restoration of the right-of-way as required herein, must be completed within the dates specified in the permit, increased by as many days as work could not be done because of circumstances beyond the control of the permittee or when work was prohibited as unseasonal or unreasonable under § 257-15.
B. 
Patch and restoration. The permittee shall patch its own work. The City may choose either to have the permittee restore the right-of-way or to restore the right-of-way itself.
(1) 
City restoration. If the City restores the right-of-way, the permittee shall pay the costs thereof within 30 days of billing. If, following such restoration, the pavement settles due to permittee's improper backfilling, the permittee shall pay to the City, within 30 days of billing, all costs associated with correcting the defective work.
(2) 
Permittee restoration. If the permittee restores the right-of-way itself, it shall at the time of application for an excavation permit post a construction performance bond in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules 7819.3000.
C. 
Standards. The permittee shall perform excavation, backfilling, patching, and restoration according to the standards and with the materials specified by the City and shall comply with Minnesota Rules 7819.1100.
D. 
Duty to correct defects. The permittee shall correct defects in patching or restoration performed by permittee or its agents. The permittee upon notification from the City, shall correct all restoration work to the extent necessary, using the method required by the City. Said work shall be completed within five calendar days of the receipt of the notice from the City, not including days during which work cannot be done because of circumstances constituting force majeure or days when work is prohibited as unseasonable or unreasonable under § 257-15.
E. 
Failure to restore. If the permittee fails to restore the right-of-way in the manner and to the condition required by the City, or fails to satisfactorily and timely complete all restoration required by the City, the City at its option may do such work. In that event the permittee shall pay to the City, within 30 days of billing, the cost of restoring the right-of-way. If the permittee fails to pay as required, the City may exercise its rights under the construction performance bond.
A. 
Joint application. Applicants may jointly apply for permits to excavate or obstruct the right-of-way at the same place and time.
B. 
Shared fees. Applicants who apply for permits for the same obstruction or excavation, which the City does not perform, may share in the payment of the obstruction or excavation permit fee. In order to obtain a joint permit, applicants must agree among themselves as to the portion each will pay and indicate the same on their applications.
C. 
With City projects. Applicants who join in a scheduled obstruction or excavation performed by the City, whether or not it is a joint application by two or more registrants or a single application, are not required to pay the excavation or obstruction and degradation portions of the permit fee, but a permit would still be required.
A. 
Limitation on area. A right-of-way or small cell wireless permit is valid only for the area of the right-of-way specified in the permit. No permittee may do any work outside the area specified in the permit, except as provided herein. Any permittee which determines that an area greater than that specified in the permit must be obstructed or excavated must, before working in that greater area, make application for a permit extension and pay any additional fees required thereby, and be granted a new permit or permit extension.
B. 
Limitation on dates. A right-of-way or small cell wireless permit is valid only for the dates specified in the permit. No permittee may begin its work before the permit start date or, except as provided herein, continue working after the end date. If a permittee does not finish the work by the permit end date, it must apply for a new permit for the additional time it needs, and receive the new permit or an extension of the old permit before working after the end date of the previous permit. This supplementary application must be submitted before the permit end date.
A. 
Compliance with other laws. Obtaining a right-of-way or small cell wireless permit does not relieve the permittee of its duty to obtain all other necessary permits, licenses, and authority and to pay all fees required by the City or other applicable rule, law or regulation. A permittee shall comply with all requirements of local, state and federal laws, including but not limited to Minn. Stat. §§ 216D.01 to 216D.09 (Gopher One Call Excavation Notice System) and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560. A permittee shall perform all work in conformance with all applicable codes and established rules and regulations, and is responsible for all work done in the right-of-way pursuant to its permit, regardless of who does the work.
B. 
Prohibited work. Except in an emergency, and with the approval of the City, no right-of-way obstruction or excavation may be done when seasonally prohibited or when conditions are unreasonable for such work.
C. 
Interference with right-of-way. A permittee shall not so obstruct a right-of-way that the natural free and clear passage of water through the gutters or other waterways shall be interfered with. Private vehicles of those doing work in the right-of-way may not be parked within or next to a permit area, unless parked in conformance with City parking regulations. The loading or unloading of trucks must be done solely within the defined permit area unless specifically authorized by the permit.
D. 
Trenchless excavation. As a condition of all applicable permits, permittees employing trenchless excavation methods, including but not limited to horizontal directional drilling, shall follow all requirements set forth in Minn. Stat. Chapter 216D and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560 and shall require potholing or open cutting over existing underground utilities before excavating, as determined by the Director.
A. 
Reasons for denial. The City may deny a permit for failure to meet the requirements and conditions of this chapter or if the City determines that the denial is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use.
B. 
Procedural requirements. The denial or revocation of a permit must be made in writing and must document the basis for the denial. The City must notify the applicant or right-of-way user, in writing, within three business days of the decision to deny or revoke a permit. If an application is denied, the right-of-way user may address the reasons for denial identified by the City and resubmit its application. If the application is resubmitted within 30 days of receipt of the notice of denial, no additional application fee shall be imposed. The City must approve or deny the resubmitted application within 30 days after submission.
The excavation, backfilling, patching and restoration, and all other work performed in the right-of-way shall be done in conformance with Minnesota Rules 7819.1100 and 7819.5000 and other applicable local requirements, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the Minn. Stat. §§ 237.162 and 237.163. Installation of service laterals shall be performed in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560 and these ordinances. Service lateral installation is further subject to those requirements and conditions set forth by the City in the applicable permits and/or agreements referenced in § 257-22B of this chapter.
A. 
Notice of completion. When the work under any permit hereunder is completed, the permittee shall furnish a completion certificate in accordance with Minnesota Rules 7819.1300 if requested by the City.
B. 
Site inspection. The permittee shall make the work site available to the City and to all others as authorized by law for inspection at all reasonable times during the execution of and upon completion of the work if requested by the City.
C. 
Authority of City.
(1) 
At the time of inspection, the City Administrator or designee may order the immediate cessation of any work which poses a serious threat to the life, health, safety, or well-being of the public.
(2) 
The City Administrator or designee may issue an order to the permittee for any work that does not conform to the terms of the permit or other applicable standards, conditions, or codes. The order shall state that failure to correct the violation will be cause for revocation of the permit. Within 10 days after issuance of the order, the permittee shall present proof to the Director that the violation has been corrected. If such proof has not been presented within the required time, the City Administrator or designee may revoke the permit pursuant to § 257-21.
A. 
Emergency situations.
(1) 
Each facility owner shall immediately notify the City Administrator or designee of any event regarding its facilities that it considers to be an emergency. The facility owner may proceed to take whatever actions are necessary to respond to the emergency. Excavators' notification to Gopher State One Call regarding an emergency situation does not fulfill this requirement. Within two business days after the occurrence of the emergency, the facility owner shall apply for the necessary permits, pay the fees associated therewith, and fulfill the rest of the requirements necessary to bring itself into compliance with this chapter for the actions it took in response to the emergency.
(2) 
If the City becomes aware of an emergency regarding right-of-way facilities, the City will attempt to contact the local representative of each facility owner affected, or potentially affected, by the emergency. In any event, the City may take whatever action it deems necessary to respond to the emergency, the cost of which shall be borne by the facility owner whose facilities occasioned the emergency.
B. 
Nonemergency situations. Except in an emergency, any person who, without first having obtained the necessary permit, obstructs or excavates a right-of-way must subsequently obtain a permit and, as a penalty, pay additional fees required by the City, deposit with the City the fees necessary to correct any damage to the right-of-way, and comply with all of the requirements of this chapter.
[Amended at time of adoption of Code (see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. II)]
If the obstruction or excavation of the right-of-way begins later or ends sooner than the date given on the permit, the permittee shall notify the City of the accurate information as soon as this information is known.
A. 
Substantial breach. The City reserves its right, as provided herein, to revoke any right-of-way permit without a fee refund, if there is a substantial breach of the terms and conditions of any statute, ordinance, rule or regulation, or any material condition of the permit. A substantial breach by the permittee shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:
(1) 
The violation of any material provision of the right-of-way permit.
(2) 
An evasion or attempt to evade any material provision of the right-of-way permit, or the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any fraud or deceit upon the City or its citizens.
(3) 
Any material misrepresentation of fact in the application for a right-of-way permit.
(4) 
The failure to complete the work in a timely manner, unless a permit extension is obtained or unless the failure to complete work is due to reasons beyond the permittee's control.
(5) 
The failure to correct, in a timely manner, work that does not conform to a condition indicated on an order issued pursuant to § 257-18.
B. 
Written notice of breach. If the City determines that the permittee has committed a substantial breach of a term or condition of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any condition of the permit, the City shall make a written demand upon the permittee to remedy such violation. The demand shall state that continued violations may be cause for revocation of the permit. A substantial breach, as stated above, will allow the City, at its discretion, to place additional or revised conditions on the permit to mitigate and remedy the breach.
C. 
Response to notice of breach. Within 24 hours of receiving notification of the breach, the permittee shall provide the City with a plan, acceptable to the City, that will cure the breach. The permittee's failure to so contact the City, or the permittee's failure to timely submit an acceptable plan, or the permittee's failure to reasonably implement the approved plan shall be cause for immediate revocation of the permit. Further, the permittee's failure to so contact the City, or the permittee's failure to submit an acceptable plan, or the permittee's failure to reasonably implement the approved plan shall automatically place the permittee on probation for one full year.
D. 
Cause for probation. From time to time, the City may establish a list of conditions of the permit, which if breached will automatically place the permittee on probation for one full year, such as, but not limited to, working out of the allotted time period or working on right-of-way grossly outside of the permit authorization.
E. 
Automatic revocation. If a permittee, while on probation, commits a breach as outlined above, the permittee's permit will automatically be revoked and the permittee will not be allowed further permits for one full year, except for emergency repairs.
F. 
Reimbursement of City costs. If a permit is revoked, the permittee shall also reimburse the City for the City's reasonable costs, including restoration costs and the costs of collection and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with such revocation.
A. 
Information required. Each permittee shall provide mapping information required by the City in accordance with Minnesota Rules 7819.4000 and 7819.4100. Following completion of any work pursuant to a permit, the permittee shall provide the City Administrator or designee accurate maps and drawings certifying the "as-built" location of all equipment installed, owned, and maintained by the permittee upon request. Such maps and drawings shall include the horizontal and vertical location of all facilities and equipment and shall be provided consistent with the City's electronic mapping system, when practical or as a condition imposed by the City Administrator or designee. Failure to provide maps and drawings pursuant to this subsection may be grounds for denying future permit applications.
B. 
Service laterals. All permits issued for the installation or repair of service laterals, other than minor repairs as defined in Minnesota Rules 7560.0150, Subp. 2, shall require the permittee's use of appropriate means of establishing the horizontal locations of installed service laterals and the service lateral vertical locations in those cases where the City Administrator or designee reasonably requires it. Permittees or their subcontractors shall submit to the City Administrator or designee evidence satisfactory to the City Administrator or designee of the installed service lateral locations. Compliance with this subsection and with applicable Gopher State One Call law and Minnesota Rules governing service laterals installed after December 31, 2005, shall be a condition of any City approval necessary for:
(1) 
Payments to contractors working on a public improvement project, including those under Minn. Stat. Chapter 429; and
(2) 
City approval under development agreements or other subdivision or site plan approval under Minn. Stat. Chapter 462. The City Administrator or designee shall reasonably determine the appropriate method of providing such information to the City. Failure to provide prompt and accurate information on the service laterals installed may result in the revocation of the permit issued for the work or the denial of future permits to the offending permittee or its subcontractors.
[Amended at time of adoption of Code (see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. II)]
A. 
Placement, location, and relocation of facilities must comply with the Act, with other applicable law, and with Minnesota Rules 7819.3100, 7819.5000, and 7819.5100, to the extent the rules do not limit authority otherwise available to the City.
B. 
Corridors.
(1) 
The City may assign a specific area within the right-of-way, or any particular segment thereof as may be necessary, for each type of facility that is or, pursuant to current technology, the City expects will someday be located within the right-of-way. All excavation, obstruction, or other permits issued by the City involving the installation or replacement of facilities shall designate the proper corridor for the facilities at issue.
(2) 
Any person who has facilities in the right-of-way in a position at variance with the corridors established by the City shall, no later than at the time of the next reconstruction or excavation of the area where the facilities are located, move the facilities to the assigned position within the right-of-way, unless this requirement is waived by the City for good cause shown, upon consideration of such factors as the remaining economic life of the facilities, public safety, customer service needs, and hardship to the facility owner.
C. 
Limitation of space. To protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public, or when necessary, to protect the right-of-way and its current use, the City shall have the power to prohibit or limit the placement of new or additional facilities within the right-of-way. In making such decisions, the City shall strive to the extent possible to accommodate all existing and potential users of the right-of-way, but shall be guided primarily by considerations of the public interest, the public's needs for the particular utility service, the condition of the right-of-way, the time of year with respect to essential utilities, the protection of existing facilities in the right-of-way, and future City plans for public improvements and development projects which have been determined to be in the public interest.
In addition to complying with the requirements of Minn. Stat. §§ 216D.01 to 216D.09 ("One Call Excavation Notice System"), before the start date of any right-of-way excavation, each permittee who has facilities or equipment in the area to be excavated shall mark the horizontal and vertical placement of all said facilities. Any permittee whose facilities are less than 20 inches below a concrete or asphalt surface shall notify and work closely with the excavation contractor to establish the exact location of its facilities and the best procedure for excavation.
A. 
Most preferable locations. The following are the most preferred areas for new small wireless facilities in the order of preference [(1) being most preferable]:
(1) 
Industrial districts if not adjacent to a park, residential district or historic district.
(2) 
Highway rights-of-way areas if not adjacent to a park, or residential district.
(3) 
Commercial districts if not adjacent to a park, or residential district.
B. 
Co-location preference. It is the City's strong preference that whenever an applicant proposes to place a new small wireless facility that the applicant co-locate the same on existing wireless support structures.
C. 
Least preferable locations. The following are the least preferred areas for new small wireless facilities in the order of preference [(2) being least preferable].
(1) 
Residential Districts.
(2) 
Parks.
D. 
Consideration of alternate locations. The City reserves the right to propose an alternate location for a small wireless facility and/or wireless support structure to the location proposed in the application within 100 feet of the proposed location or within a distance that is equivalent to the width of the ROW in or on which the small wireless facility and/or wireless support structure is proposed, whichever is greater, which the operator shall use if it has the right to use the alternate location on reasonable terms and conditions and the alternate location does not impose technical limits or additional costs.
E. 
Guidelines on placement. The City desires to promote cleanly organized and streamlined facilities using the smallest and least intrusive means available to provide wireless services to the community. Generally, a small wireless facility and/or wireless support structure shall match and be consistent with the materials and finish of the wireless support structure, adjacent City poles, and of the surrounding area adjacent to their location. In the absence of adjacent City poles, the wireless support structure shall match the materials and finish of the adjacent utility poles. The following additional guidelines on placement shall apply:
(1) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located no closer than 150 feet away, radially, from another small wireless facility and wireless support structure.
(2) 
A combination wireless support structure and streetlight pole should only be located where an existing pole (usually Connexus Energy or East Central Energy) can be removed and replaced, or at a new location where it has been identified that a streetlight is necessary.
(3) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located in a manner that does not impede, obstruct, or hinder usual public pedestrian or vehicular travel or public safety on a ROW.
(4) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located in a manner that does not obstruct the legal use of a ROW by a utility provider.
(5) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located in a manner that does not violate the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act.
(6) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located in a manner that does not negatively impact the structural integrity of the associated wireless support structure.
(7) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located in alignment with existing trees to the extent there are boulevard trees to be in alignment with, utility poles, and streetlights.
(8) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located equal distance between trees when possible, with a minimum of 15 feet separation such that no proposed disturbance shall occur within the critical root zone of any tree.
(9) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located with applicable clearance from existing utilities.
(10) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located so as not to be located along the frontage of any building deemed to be of historic significance on a federal, state, or local level.
(11) 
Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall not be located within vision triangles at street intersections.
(12) 
New wireless poles shall not be located directly in front of any existing residential, commercial or industrial structure. (Figure 1)
(13) 
To the greatest extent possible, new wireless poles shall be located in line with existing lot lines or an equidistance from any two existing structures. In areas of the City where multiple poles abut each other and/or where no side lot setback requirements exist, new wireless poles shall not be located directly in front of an entrance or window of any existing structure. (Figure 2).
Figure 1 - Example of Acceptable Location Between Residential Homes:
257 Figure 1.tif
Figure 2 - Example of Acceptable Location Between Commercial Buildings:
257 Figure 2.tif
F. 
Limitations. While the City fully intends to apply the guidelines established in this policy uniformly to all small wireless facility applications, there may be circumstances where not every specific guideline may be met. In these cases, City staff will use its reasonable discretion in approving small wireless facilities permit applications that deviate from the strict application of this policy.
A. 
Antennas.
(1) 
Each small wireless antenna shall be located entirely within a shroud or canister type enclosure.
(2) 
The diameter of the antenna enclosure at its widest point should not be wider than two times the diameter of the top of the wireless support structure. The enclosure shall not exceed six cubic feet in volume.
(3) 
All antenna enclosures shall either be mounted to the top of the wireless support structure pole and aligned with the center line of the wireless support structure, or mounted to the side of the wireless support structure such that the vertical center line of the antenna enclosure shall be parallel with the wireless support structure with the height of the side mounted antenna being at a location on the wireless support structure noted in the application and approved by the City, but at least 10 feet above ground level at its lowest point. Antennas must not exceed the building height requirements in their respective zoning district by more than 10 feet, with a maximum height of 50 feet.
(4) 
Tree "topping" or the improper pruning of trees is prohibited. Any proposed pruning or removal of trees, shrubs or other landscaping already existing in the ROW must be noted in the application and must be approved by the City.
B. 
Cables and wires. All cables, wires and connectors related to the small wireless facility must be fully concealed on the wireless support structure and shall match the color of the wireless support structure. There shall be no external cables and wires related to the small wireless facility hanging off or otherwise exposed on the wireless support structure.
C. 
Colors. All colors shall match the background of any wireless support structure that the facilities are located upon, including equipment cabinets. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of existing wooden utility poles, finishes of conduit shall be zinc, aluminum or stainless steel, or colored to match those metal finishes, and equipment cabinets shall be the color of brushed aluminum.
D. 
Equipment enclosures/concealment/maintenance.
(1) 
Equipment enclosures, including electric meters, shall be as small as possible, but in no event larger than 28 cubic feet in volume. Ground-mounted equipment shall incorporate concealment elements into the proposed design matching color and materials of the wireless support structure, unless other materials or colors are approved by the City. Concealment may include, but shall not be limited to, landscaping, strategic placement in less obtrusive locations and placement within existing or replacement street furniture.
(2) 
Radio equipment shall be fully enclosed within an equipment cabinet or concealed within the antenna shroud enclosure matching the color and materials of the wireless support structure, unless other materials or colors are approved by the City.
(3) 
Landscaping concealing equipment enclosures shall be planted in such quantity and size such that one-hundred-percent screening is achieved within two years of installation.
(4) 
All equipment enclosures shall be maintained in good condition. They shall be completely sealed with a secured access. The small cell company and/or right-of-way user must take reasonable care and measures to prevent damage to their facilities. Open, broken or unsealed enclosures shall be considered a public nuisance under City Code Chapter 216.
E. 
Signage; logos; lights; decals; cooling fans.
(1) 
Signage. The small wireless facility permittee shall post its name, location identifying information, and emergency telephone number in an area on the cabinet of the small wireless facility that is visible to the public. Signage required under this section shall not exceed four inches by six inches, unless otherwise required by law (e.g., radio-frequency (RF) ground notification signs) or the City. If no cabinet exists, the signage shall be placed at the base of the pole.
(2) 
Lights. New small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall not be illuminated, except in accord with state or federal regulations, or unless illumination is integral to the camouflaging strategy such as design intended to look like a streetlight pole.
(3) 
Logos/decals. The small wireless facility operator/permittee shall remove or paint over unnecessary equipment manufacturer decals. The color shall match or shall be as approved by the City. Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall not include advertisements and may only display information required by a federal, state or local agency. The small wireless facility operator/permittee shall utilize the smallest and lowest visibility RF warning sticker required by government or electric utility regulations. Placement of the RF sticker shall be as close to the antenna as possible.
(4) 
Cooling fans. In residential areas, the small wireless facility operator/permittee shall use a passive cooling system. In the event that a fan is needed, the small wireless facility operator/permittee shall use a cooling fan with a low noise profile.
When the City does work in the right-of-way and finds it necessary to maintain, support, or move a permittee's facilities to protect it, the City shall notify the local representative as early as is reasonably possible. The costs associated therewith will be billed to that permittee and must be paid within 30 days from the date of billing. Each permittee shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any facilities in the right-of-way which it or its facilities damage. Each permittee shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any damage to the facilities of another permittee caused during the City's response to an emergency occasioned by that permittee's facilities.
Reservation of right. If the City vacates a right-of-way that contains the facilities of a permittee, the permittee's rights in the vacated right-of-way are governed by Minnesota Rules 7819.3200.
By accepting a permit under this chapter, a permittee agrees to defend and indemnify the City in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules 7819.1250.
A. 
Discontinued operations. A permittee who has determined to discontinue all or a portion of its operations in the City must provide information satisfactory to the City that the permittee's obligations for its facilities in the right-of-way under this chapter have been lawfully assumed by another permittee.
B. 
Removal. Any permittee who has abandoned facilities in any right-of-way shall remove it from that right-of-way if required in conjunction with other right-of-way repair, excavation, or construction, unless this requirement is waived by the City.
An applicant or permittee that has been denied a permit; has had a permit revoked; believes that the fees imposed are not in conformity with Minn. Stat. § 237.163, Subd. 6; or disputes a determination of the City Administrator or designee regarding provisions of this chapter may have the denial, revocation, fee imposition, or decision reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council. The City Council shall act on a timely written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting, provided the right-of-way user has submitted its appeal with sufficient time to include the appeal as a regular agenda item. A decision by the City Council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition will be in writing and supported by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision.
A permittee's rights are subject to the regulatory and police powers of the City to adopt and enforce general ordinances as necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
If any portion of this chapter is for any reason held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Nothing in this chapter precludes the City from requiring a franchise agreement with the applicant, as allowed by law, in addition to requirements set forth herein.