[R.O. 2011 §34-123.1; Ord. No. 6765 §1, 1-26-2009]
A. In
conducting its review, the Council shall consider the staff report
on the site plan and document findings of fact based directly upon
the particular evidence presented to it supporting the conclusion
that the proposed site plan review:
1. Complies with all applicable provisions of this Chapter;
2. At the specific location will contribute to and promote the community
welfare or convenience;
3. Will not cause substantial injury to the value of neighboring property;
and
4. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood development
plan (if applicable), the Olive Boulevard Design Guidelines (if applicable),
and any other official planning and development policies of the City;
and
5. Will provide off-street parking and loading areas in accordance with the standards contained in Article
VII of this Chapter.
B. In determining whether the evidence supports the conclusions required by Section
400.2630 of this Chapter, the Council shall consider the review criteria established as follows:
1. The proposed use complies with the standards of this Chapter, including performance standards, and the standards for motor vehicle oriented businesses, if applicable, as contained in Section
400.2720 of this Article;
2. The impact of projected vehicular traffic volumes and site access
is not detrimental with regard to the surrounding traffic flow, pedestrian
safety and accessibility of emergency vehicles and equipment;
3. The proposed use will not cause undue impacts on the provision of
public services such as police and fire protection, schools and parks;
4. Adequate utility, drainage and other such necessary facilities have
been or will be provided;
5. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area;
6. The proposed use will not adversely impact designated historic landmarks
or districts; and
7. Where a proposed use has the potential for adverse impacts, sufficient
measures have been or will be taken by the applicant that would negate,
or reduce to an acceptable level, such potentially adverse impacts.
Such measures may include, but are not necessarily limited to:
a. Improvements to public streets, such as provision of turning lanes,
traffic control islands, traffic control devices, etc.;
b. Limiting vehicular access so as to avoid conflicting turning movements
to/from the site and access points of adjacent properties, and to
avoid an increase in vehicular traffic in nearby residential areas;
c. Provision of cross-access agreement(s) and paved connections between
the applicant's property and adjacent property(ies) which would help
mitigate traffic on adjacent streets;
d. Provision of additional screening and landscape buffers, above and
beyond the minimum requirements of this Chapter;
e. Strategically locating accessory facilities, such as trash storage,
loading areas and drive-through facilities, so as to limit potentially
adverse impacts on adjacent properties while maintaining appropriate
access to such facilities and without impeding internal traffic circulation;
f. Limiting hours of operation of the use of certain operational activities
of the use (e.g., deliveries); and
g. Any other site or building design techniques which would further
enhance neighborhood compatibility.
C. The
City Council shall consider the extent to which such evidence demonstrated
compliance with the foregoing criteria.
D. It
shall be the responsibility of the applicant to clearly establish
that the review criteria are met.