Any regulated activity that meets the following exemption criteria
is exempt from the part(s) of this chapter as specified herein. However,
the requirements of this chapter shall otherwise remain in effect.
The criteria for exemption in this section apply to the total development
proposed, including instances in which the development is proposed
to take place in phases. The date of enactment of the previous stormwater
management ordinance (September 23, 2015) shall be the starting point
from which future development and the respective proposed impervious
surface computations shall be cumulatively considered and regulated.
Exemption shall not relieve an applicant from implementing such measures
as necessary to meet the intent of this chapter or compliance with
any NPDES permit requirements. The applicant must also demonstrate
that the proposed development/additional impervious area will not
adversely impact the adjacent properties and/or the existing drainageways
and storm sewer systems.
A. Regulated activities that create full DIAs or are less than 500 square
feet of new or altered impervious surface are exempt from the volume,
peak rate control and the SWM site plan requirements; however, a stormwater
permit application is required to be submitted in order to track cumulative
impervious area for the parcel.
B. Regulated activities that create full DIAs or are equal to or more
than 500 square feet but less than 1,000 square feet are exempt from
the peak rate control requirement but are obligated to provide volume
controls [permitted to use Chapter 8.7 of the PA Stormwater BMP Manual:
Guidance for Stormwater Calculations for Volume Control Guideline
1 and Volume Control Guideline 2 (providing generalized control of
runoff volumes associated with a two inches rainfall event)], and
a SWM site plan and complete an O&M agreement.
C. Maintaining SWM BMPs and stormwater collection and conveyance (C&C)
facilities in accordance with a land development plan approved by
the Borough.
D. Implementing emergency repairs to protect public health, safety and
welfare. (A verbal notification, with reasoning for emergency status,
shall be provided to the Borough before the work is initiated. Pending
Borough concurrence, a written description of the location, situation,
threat, and work shall be submitted to the Borough within two calendar
days of activities commencement. If the Borough finds that work does
not constitute an emergency, the work shall cease immediately, and
the requirements of this chapter shall be met as applicable.)
E. Projects involving only/principally the construction of sidewalks
and curbing within public rights-of-way.
F. Agricultural activity is exempt from the rate control and SWM site
plan preparation requirements of this chapter, provided that the activities
are performed according to the requirements of 25 Pa. Code Chapter
102.
G. Forest management and timber operations are exempt from the rate
control and SWM site plan preparation requirements of this chapter,
provided that the activities are performed according to the requirements
of 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102.
H. Domestic gardening and landscaping with trees, shrubs, and flowers
are exempt from specific approval and permitting under this chapter
so long as those activities are associated with one, and only one,
dwelling unit and the activities comply with all other applicable
ordinances and statutes.
I. Exemptions from certain provisions of this chapter shall not relieve the applicant from the requirements in §
310-13D through
L of this chapter.
J. The Borough may deny or revoke any exemption pursuant to this section
at any time for any project that the Borough determines poses a threat
to public health, safety, property, or the environment.
K. For all regulated activities that are exempt from the SWM site plan
preparation, the applicant shall submit a site plan in sufficient
detail to show the existing conditions and proposed improvements as
well as basic design calculations.
L. For projects that are beyond the maximum extent practicable to provide
the required stormwater management volume within their parcel shall
coordinate with the Borough to identify alternate off-site locations
where a BMP or contribution towards a joint BMP project could result
in the proper management of stormwater runoff. Alternate BMPs must
reside in the same subwatershed as the project (subject) parcel. Any
fees paid in lieu of actual construction site improvements shall be
based upon a fee schedule as set, managed and approved by the Borough's
stormwater authority.
The low-impact development practices provided in the BMP Manual
shall be utilized for all regulated activities to the maximum extent
practicable. Water volume controls shall be implemented using the
Design Storm Method in Subsection A or the Simplified Method in Subsection
B below. For regulated activity areas equal to or less than one acre
that do not require hydrologic routing to design the stormwater facilities,
this chapter establishes no preference for either methodology; therefore,
the applicant may select either methodology on the basis of economic
considerations, the intrinsic limitations on applicability of the
analytical procedures associated with each methodology, and other
factors.
A. The Design Storm Method (CG-1 in the BMP Manual) is applicable to
any size of regulated activity. This method requires detailed modeling
based on site conditions.
(1) Do not increase the post-development total runoff volume for all
storms equal to or less than the two-year, twenty-four-hour duration
precipitation or 2.86 inches in 24 hours, whichever is greater.
(2) For modeling purposes:
(a)
Existing (predevelopment) nonforested pervious areas must be
considered meadow.
(b)
Twenty percent of the existing impervious area of a project
site, when present, shall be considered meadow in the model for existing
conditions.
B. The Simplified Method (CG-2 in the BMP Manual) provided below is
independent of site conditions and should be used if the Design Storm
Method is not followed. This method is not applicable to regulated
activities greater than one acre or for projects that require design
of stormwater storage facilities. For new or altered impervious surfaces:
(1) Stormwater facilities shall capture at least the first two inches
of runoff from all new or altered impervious surfaces.
(2) At least the first one inch of runoff from new or altered impervious
surfaces shall be permanently removed from the runoff flow, i.e.,
it shall not be released into the surface waters of this commonwealth.
Removal options for the first one inch of runoff include reuse, evaporation,
transpiration, and infiltration.
(3) Wherever possible, infiltration facilities should be designed to
accommodate infiltration of the entire permanently removed runoff;
however, in all cases at least the first 0.5 inch of the permanently
removed stormwater runoff shall be infiltrated.
(4) This method is exempt from the requirements of §
310-16, Rate controls.
C. Infiltration alternative. Where infiltration is not possible due to soil characteristics or is not desirable given other characteristics, water quality control may be proposed as an alternative to strict adherence to the volume control standards of §
310-15 of this chapter. Where water quality control is proposed, the following standards shall be achieved:
(1) At a minimum, the following documentation shall be provided to justify
the proposal to reduce the infiltration requirements:
(a)
Description of and justification for field infiltration/permeability
testing with respect to the type of test and test locations.
(b)
An interpretive narrative describing existing soils of the site
and their structure as these relate to the interaction between soils
and water characteristics of the site. In addition to providing soil
and soil profile descriptions, this narrative shall identify depth
to seasonal water tables and depth to bedrock and provide a description
of all subsurface elements (restrictive layers, geology, etc.) that
influence the direction and rate of subsurface water movement.
(c)
A qualitative assessment of the site's contribution to
annual aquifer recharge shall be made, along with the identification
of any restrictions or limitations associated with the use of designed
infiltration facilities.
(d)
The provided documentation must be signed and sealed by a qualified
professional.
(e)
Infiltration testing shall be performed at the proposed bottom
elevation of the facility.
(2) Water quality BMPs shall be implemented on all permanent stormwater
discharges from the proposed project site to achieve pollutant removal
efficiencies in accordance with the following table. [Efficiency removal
rating shall be based on a testing specification for particle size
distribution as required per TARP, the Technology Acceptance and Reciprocity
Partnership (http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/pollprev/techservices/tarp/),
Tier 1 and 2 protocol testing. The minimum design flow shall be based
on the peak flow produced from one inch of rain as calculated.]
Required Pollutant Removal Efficiencies for Infiltration Alternatives
|
---|
Pollutant Load
|
Units
|
Required Removal Efficiency
|
---|
Total suspended solids (TSS)
|
Pounds
|
85%
|
Total phosphorus (TP)
|
Pounds
|
85%
|
Total nitrate (NO3)
|
Pounds
|
50%
|
(3) Design guidance from the most current version of the BMP Manual,
or equivalent resource as precoordinated with Hanover Borough, shall
be consulted when choosing design criteria for water quality BMPs.
D. Where proposed practices are based on the use of disconnected impervious
areas, the pathway upon which the discharge will occur shall be deep
ripped and/or soil amendments included to improve the infiltrative
capacity of the soil/turf section. Physical testing of the soils infiltrative
capacity will be required to be conducted and submitted to the Borough,
prior to the closeout of the project. Further, an operations and maintenance
agreement will be required to ensure that testing occurs on no less
than a three-year cycle to ensure proper infiltration.